Literature DB >> 12035043

Can we select which patients with small breast cancers should receive adjuvant chemotherapy?

William C Wood1, Marge Anderson, Robert H Lyles, Toncred M Styblo, Douglas Murray, Charles Staley, Lily Yang, Grant Carlson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify the risk of systemic metastases from T1a and T1b N0 breast cancers in patients treated in an academic center, and to seek factors to identify the patients at greatest risk of such failure. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: With the demonstration that adjuvant chemotherapy reduces the death rate from breast cancer by roughly one quarter across all risk groups, controversy has reigned regarding possible exclusions from therapy. T1a and T1b N0 tumors (1-cm diameter and smaller with negative axillary nodes) have been considered at low risk for metastasis since the report from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center of a 90% survival rate at 10 years. Subsequent reports have suggested an even more favorable prognosis for this group. However, consensus statements advise selecting some of these women for treatment, and many do receive adjuvant chemotherapy.
METHODS: Sequential patients with breast cancer at the Emory Clinic were prospectively staged and followed up for outcome. The records of patients with T1a and T1b N0 tumors were reviewed for exact tumor diameter, grade, receptor status, adjuvant therapy, and outcome. A corrected data set was stripped of patient identifiers and analyzed by Kaplan-Meier methods. Subgroups were formed based on tumor grade (1 vs. 3), adjuvant chemotherapy (use vs. no use), and adjuvant tamoxifen (use vs. no use) and were compared via log-rank tests.
RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-two women were identified. Two developed metastatic disease and one experienced a local failure after breast-conserving treatment. The estimated disease-free survival rate at 10 years was 98.7%. With only two distant failures and one local failure, there was no significant difference by grade, receptor status, or use of adjuvant chemotherapy or tamoxifen.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk of systemic failure from such tumors barely exceeded 1% at 10 years. Unless future studies can identify a subgroup at higher risk, the cognitive changes associated with cytotoxic chemotherapy or the loss of estrogen involved do not appear to have sufficient offsetting benefit to warrant chemotherapy for this group of women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12035043      PMCID: PMC1422516          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200206000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  15 in total

Review 1.  Meeting highlights: International Consensus Panel on the Treatment of Primary Breast Cancer. Seventh International Conference on Adjuvant Therapy of Primary Breast Cancer.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; J H Glick; R D Gelber; A S Coates; H J Senn
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer. September 9-11, 1985.

Authors: 
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1986 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases.

Authors:  C L Carter; C Allen; D E Henson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1989-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  A long-term follow-up study of survival in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) breast carcinoma.

Authors:  P R Rosen; S Groshen; P E Saigo; D W Kinne; S Hellman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Effects of adjuvant tamoxifen and of cytotoxic therapy on mortality in early breast cancer. An overview of 61 randomized trials among 28,896 women.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-12-29       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Preliminary assessment of cognitive function in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen.

Authors:  A Paganini-Hill; L J Clark
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  Cognitive function in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  C B Brezden; K A Phillips; M Abdolell; T Bunston; I F Tannock
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Prognostic significance of biologic markers in node-negative breast cancer patients: a prospective study.

Authors:  A Volpi; F De Paola; O Nanni; A M Granato; P Bajorko; A Becciolini; E Scarpi; A Riccobon; M Balzi; D Amadori
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapy. 133 randomised trials involving 31,000 recurrences and 24,000 deaths among 75,000 women. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-01-04       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-09-19       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Predictive and prognostic value of the 21-gene recurrence score in hormone receptor-positive, node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Adam M Brufsky
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.339

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.