PURPOSE: To use thin-section computed tomography (CT) to distinguish between causes of obstructive pulmonary disease, to determine which distinctions give rise to diagnostic imprecision, and to identify the most useful CT features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thin-section CT scans of 105 patients with obstructive pulmonary disease (asthma, n = 35; centrilobular emphysema, n = 30; panlobular emphysema, n = 21; and obliterative bronchiolitis, n = 19) and 33 healthy subjects were assessed independently by two observers. The most likely diagnosis and a confidence rating were assigned. Individual thin-section CT features were recorded. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value for first-choice diagnoses were calculated. The prevalence of CT features between pairs of conditions was compared with the chi(2) or Fisher exact test as appropriate. RESULTS: A correct first-choice diagnosis was made in 199 of 276 (72%) observations. A correct first-choice diagnosis was made in 35 of 38 (92%) observations in patients with obliterative bronchiolitis, in 53 of 60 (88%) observations in patients with centrilobular emphysema, in 53 of 66 (80%) observations in healthy subjects, in 37 of 70 (53%) observations in patients with asthma, and in 20 of 42 (48%) observations in patients with panlobular emphysema. The major sources of diagnostic inaccuracy were differentiation between panlobular and centrilobular emphysema, asthma and normality, and asthma and obliterative bronchiolitis. There were significant increases in prevalence of (a) bronchial wall thickening and vascular attenuation in patients with asthma when compared with healthy subjects and (b) vascular attenuation and decreased attenuation in patients with obliterative bronchiolitis when compared with patients with asthma (P <.001). CONCLUSION: CT helps to distinguish diseases that cause airflow obstruction. Thin-section CT is particularly accurate in the identification of obliterative bronchiolitis.
PURPOSE: To use thin-section computed tomography (CT) to distinguish between causes of obstructive pulmonary disease, to determine which distinctions give rise to diagnostic imprecision, and to identify the most useful CT features. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thin-section CT scans of 105 patients with obstructive pulmonary disease (asthma, n = 35; centrilobular emphysema, n = 30; panlobular emphysema, n = 21; and obliterative bronchiolitis, n = 19) and 33 healthy subjects were assessed independently by two observers. The most likely diagnosis and a confidence rating were assigned. Individual thin-section CT features were recorded. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value for first-choice diagnoses were calculated. The prevalence of CT features between pairs of conditions was compared with the chi(2) or Fisher exact test as appropriate. RESULTS: A correct first-choice diagnosis was made in 199 of 276 (72%) observations. A correct first-choice diagnosis was made in 35 of 38 (92%) observations in patients with obliterative bronchiolitis, in 53 of 60 (88%) observations in patients with centrilobular emphysema, in 53 of 66 (80%) observations in healthy subjects, in 37 of 70 (53%) observations in patients with asthma, and in 20 of 42 (48%) observations in patients with panlobular emphysema. The major sources of diagnostic inaccuracy were differentiation between panlobular and centrilobular emphysema, asthma and normality, and asthma and obliterative bronchiolitis. There were significant increases in prevalence of (a) bronchial wall thickening and vascular attenuation in patients with asthma when compared with healthy subjects and (b) vascular attenuation and decreased attenuation in patients with obliterative bronchiolitis when compared with patients with asthma (P <.001). CONCLUSION: CT helps to distinguish diseases that cause airflow obstruction. Thin-section CT is particularly accurate in the identification of obliterative bronchiolitis.
Authors: R Graham Barr; Eugene A Berkowitz; Francesca Bigazzi; Frederick Bode; Jessica Bon; Russell P Bowler; Caroline Chiles; James D Crapo; Gerard J Criner; Jeffrey L Curtis; Chandra Dass; Asger Dirksen; Mark T Dransfield; Goutham Edula; Leif Erikkson; Adam Friedlander; Maya Galperin-Aizenberg; Warren B Gefter; David S Gierada; Philippe A Grenier; Jonathan Goldin; MeiLan K Han; Nicola A Hanania; Nadia N Hansel; Francine L Jacobson; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Vuokko L Kinnula; David A Lipson; David A Lynch; William MacNee; Barry J Make; A James Mamary; Howard Mann; Nathaniel Marchetti; Mario Mascalchi; Geoffrey McLennan; James R Murphy; David Naidich; Hrudaya Nath; John D Newell; Massimo Pistolesi; Elizabeth A Regan; John J Reilly; Robert Sandhaus; Joyce D Schroeder; Frank Sciurba; Saher Shaker; Amir Sharafkhaneh; Edwin K Silverman; Robert M Steiner; Charlton Strange; Nicola Sverzellati; Joseph H Tashjian; Edwin J R van Beek; Lacey Washington; George R Washko; Gloria Westney; Susan A Wood; Prescott G Woodruff Journal: COPD Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 2.409
Authors: David A Lynch; John H M Austin; James C Hogg; Philippe A Grenier; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Alexander A Bankier; R Graham Barr; Thomas V Colby; Jeffrey R Galvin; Pierre Alain Gevenois; Harvey O Coxson; Eric A Hoffman; John D Newell; Massimo Pistolesi; Edwin K Silverman; James D Crapo Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-05-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Nicola Sverzellati; David A Lynch; Massimo Pistolesi; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; P A Grenier; C Wilson; J D Crapo Journal: Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis Date: 2014
Authors: Song Soo Kim; Joon Beom Seo; Ho Yun Lee; Dipti V Nevrekar; Anna V Forssen; James D Crapo; Joyce D Schroeder; David A Lynch Journal: Radiology Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Tobias Achenbach; Oliver Weinheimer; Alexander Biedermann; Sabine Schmitt; Daniela Freudenstein; Edula Goutham; Richard Peter Kunz; Roland Buhl; Christoph Dueber; Claus Peter Heussel Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2008-07-19 Impact factor: 5.315