Literature DB >> 12033527

Utilities measured by rating scale, time trade-off, and standard gamble: review and reference for health care professionals.

Takeshi Morimoto1, Tsuguya Fukui.   

Abstract

Utility is a simple expression of health-related quality of life in individuals with different states of health. A number of studies on utility measurements were conducted and published in the past. We retrieved 164 English-language articles which appeared in 1966 through 1999 for a systematic review. The number of reports has been increasing at an accelerating pace, especially during the past decade. The most widely used method of utility measurement was time trade-off, TTO (40%), followed by rating scale, RS (31%) and standard gamble, SG (29%). The utility of chronic health status was more frequently reported as compared with acute health status (907 vs 86). Accordingly, frequently explored clinical categories were cardiology, neurology, nephrology, and gastroenterology. Specifically, coronary heart disease (52 utilities), physical disability due to neurological diseases (45 utilities), chronic renal failure (74 utilities), and colorectal cancer (29 utilities) were subject to utility measurement. Mental or social dysfunctioning accounted for only a small proportion (48 utilities). There is a strong tendency for RS to yield the lowest and SG to yield the highest values. We compiled an extensive list of the results of studies on utility as a reference for health care professionals in this field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12033527     DOI: 10.2188/jea.12.160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0917-5040            Impact factor:   3.211


  40 in total

1.  Social relationships as a major determinant in the valuation of health states.

Authors:  Ulrich Frick; Hyacinth Irving; Jürgen Rehm
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Feasibility, comparability, and reliability of the standard gamble compared with the rating scale and time trade-off techniques in Korean population.

Authors:  Seon-Ha Kim; Sang-Il Lee; Min-Woo Jo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-08-11       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Patients' perceptions of the value of current vision: assessment of preference values among patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization--The Submacular Surgery Trials Vision Preference Value Scale: SST Report No. 6.

Authors:  Eric B Bass; Marsha J Marsh; Carol M Mangione; Neil M Bressler; Ashley L Childs; Li Ming Dong; Barbara S Hawkins; Harris A Jaffee; Päivi Miskala
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2004-12

Review 4.  Cost-Effectiveness Analyses in Orthopaedic Surgery: Raising the Bar.

Authors:  Prashant V Rajan; Rameez A Qudsi; Lindsey L Wolf; Elena Losina
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Elective management of cervical and parotid lymph nodes in stage N0 cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Wai Keat Wong; Randall P Morton
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Measurement and comparison of health utility assessments in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Authors:  Elisabeth H Ference; Vanessa Stubbs; Alcina K Lidder; Rakesh K Chandra; David Conley; Pedro C Avila; Annemarie G Hirsch; Jin-Young Min; Stephanie Shintani Smith; Robert C Kern; Bruce K Tan
Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 3.858

7.  Supporting shared decision making within the MobiGuide project.

Authors:  Silvana Quaglini; Yuval Shahar; Mor Peleg; Silvia Miksch; Carlo Napolitano; Mercedes Rigla; Angels Pallàs; Enea Parimbelli; Lucia Sacchi
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

Review 8.  Clinical implications of numeracy: theory and practice.

Authors:  Wendy Nelson; Valerie F Reyna; Angela Fagerlin; Isaac Lipkus; Ellen Peters
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2008-08-02

Review 9.  The estimation of utility weights in cost-utility analysis for mental disorders: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michael Sonntag; Hans-Helmut König; Alexander Konnopka
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.981

10.  Exploring the impact of changes in neurogenic urinary incontinence frequency and condition-specific quality of life on preference-based outcomes.

Authors:  William Hollingworth; Jonathan D Campbell; Jonathan Kowalski; Arliene Ravelo; Isabelle Girod; Andrew Briggs; Sean D Sullivan
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.