Literature DB >> 12032300

Evaluating conformational free energies: the colony energy and its application to the problem of loop prediction.

Zhexin Xiang1, Cinque S Soto, Barry Honig.   

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a method to account for the shape of the potential energy curve in the evaluation of conformational free energies. The method is based on a procedure that generates a set of conformations, each with its own force-field energy, but adds a term to this energy that favors conformations that are close in structure (have a low rmsd) to other conformations. The sum of the force-field energy and rmsd-dependent term is defined here as the "colony energy" of a given conformation, because each conformation that is generated is viewed as representing a colony of points. The use of the colony energy tends to select conformations that are located in broad energy basins. The approach is applied to the ab initio prediction of the conformations of all of the loops in a dataset of 135 nonredundant proteins. By using an rmsd from a native criterion based on the superposition of loop stems, the average rmsd of 5-, 6-, 7-, and 8-residue long loops is 0.85, 0.92, 1.23, and 1.45 A, respectively. For 8-residue loops, 60 of 61 predictions have an rmsd of less than 3.0 A. The use of the colony energy is found to improve significantly the results obtained from the potential function alone. (The loop prediction program, "Loopy," can be downloaded at http://trantor.bioc.columbia.edu.)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12032300      PMCID: PMC124248          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.102179699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  26 in total

1.  New efficient statistical sequence-dependent structure prediction of short to medium-sized protein loops based on an exhaustive loop classification.

Authors:  J Wojcik; J P Mornon; J Chomilier
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-06-25       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  Ab initio modeling of small, medium, and large loops in proteins.

Authors:  S Galaktionov; G V Nikiforovich; G R Marshall
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.505

3.  Conformational sampling using high-temperature molecular dynamics.

Authors:  R E Bruccoleri; M Karplus
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.505

4.  WHAT IF: a molecular modeling and drug design program.

Authors:  G Vriend
Journal:  J Mol Graph       Date:  1990-03

5.  Structural families in loops of homologous proteins: automatic classification, modelling and application to antibodies.

Authors:  A C Martin; J M Thornton
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1996-11-15       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  Modeling of protein loops by simulated annealing.

Authors:  V Collura; J Higo; J Garnier
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Comparison of systematic search and database methods for constructing segments of protein structure.

Authors:  K Fidelis; P S Stern; D Bacon; J Moult
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-08

8.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.505

9.  Evaluation of the conformational free energies of loops in proteins.

Authors:  K C Smith; B Honig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1994-02

10.  A potential smoothing algorithm accurately predicts transmembrane helix packing.

Authors:  R V Pappu; G R Marshall; J W Ponder
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1999-01
View more
  139 in total

1.  Cyclic coordinate descent: A robotics algorithm for protein loop closure.

Authors:  Adrian A Canutescu; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Protein loop closure using orientational restraints from NMR data.

Authors:  Chittaranjan Tripathy; Jianyang Zeng; Pei Zhou; Bruce Randall Donald
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-12-13

3.  Histidine in continuum electrostatics protonation state calculations.

Authors:  Vernon Couch; Alexei Stuchebrukhov
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-08-30

4.  Accurate and efficient loop selections by the DFIRE-based all-atom statistical potential.

Authors:  Chi Zhang; Song Liu; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Exploring the conformational space of membrane protein folds matching distance constraints.

Authors:  Jean-Loup Faulon; Ken Sale; Malin Young
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 6.  Structural genomics: computational methods for structure analysis.

Authors:  Sharon Goldsmith-Fischman; Barry Honig
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Homology modeling provides insights into the binding mode of the PAAD/DAPIN/pyrin domain, a fourth member of the CARD/DD/DED domain family.

Authors:  Tong Liu; Ana Rojas; Yuzhen Ye; Adam Godzik
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  ASTRO-FOLD: a combinatorial and global optimization framework for Ab initio prediction of three-dimensional structures of proteins from the amino acid sequence.

Authors:  J L Klepeis; C A Floudas
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Rapid evolution in conformational space: a study of loop regions in a ubiquitous GTP binding domain.

Authors:  Christian Blouin; Davin Butt; Andrew James Roger
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  LEAP: highly accurate prediction of protein loop conformations by integrating coarse-grained sampling and optimized energy scores with all-atom refinement of backbone and side chains.

Authors:  Shide Liang; Chi Zhang; Yaoqi Zhou
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 3.376

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.