Literature DB >> 12032109

Impact of diabetes screening on quality of life.

David Edelman1, Maren K Olsen, Tara K Dudley, Amy C Harris, Eugene Z Oddone.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Diagnosis of a chronic illness can have a negative impact on patients' perception of their well-being ("labeling" effect). We sought to determine the effects of a new diagnosis of diabetes, discovered by systematic screening, on patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) 1 year after diagnosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed diabetes screening at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center of 1,253 outpatients, aged 45-64 years, who did not report having diabetes. Our initial screen was a serum HbA(1c) measurement. All subjects with HbA(1c) > or = 6.0% were invited for follow-up measurement of blood pressure and fasting plasma glucose. A case of unrecognized diabetes was defined as HbA(1c) > or = 7.0% or fasting plasma glucose > or = 7 mmol/dl. HRQoL was measured by Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 (SF-36) for all patients at baseline and 1 year after enrollment. Linear multivariable models were used to determine the independent effect of the new diagnosis of diabetes on HRQoL.
RESULTS: Mean SF-36 Physical Component Score (PCS) for all patients was 36.2, and mean Mental Component Score (MCS) was 49.6. A total of 56 patients (4.5%) were found to have diabetes at screening. Patients found to have diabetes at screening had mean PCS of 35.6, which was not different from a mean PCS of 36.3 for those patients found not to have diabetes (P = 0.67). After adjusting for baseline PCS values, PCS 1 year after screening was similar for patients with and without diabetes found at screening (P = 0.95). Similarly, patients found to have diabetes at screening had mean MCS of 48.8; those found not to have diabetes had MCS of 49.6 (P = 0.70). After adjusting for baseline MCS values, MCS 1 year after screening was also similar between the two groups (P = 0.77).
CONCLUSIONS: For patients with a new diagnosis of diabetes discovered through systematic screening, HRQoL is similar to patients found not to have diabetes. Furthermore, HRQoL scores remain stable over the year after screening. This suggests that screening for diabetes has minimal, if any, "labeling" effect with respect to HRQoL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12032109     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.6.1022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  34 in total

1.  Understanding and Assessing the Impact of Alcoholism on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review of the Content Validity of Instruments Used to Assess Health-Related Quality of Life in Alcoholism.

Authors:  Matthew D Reaney; Colin Martin; Jane Speight
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus to prevent vascular complications: updated recommendations from the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.

Authors:  Denice S Feig; Valerie A Palda; Lorraine Lipscombe
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-01-18       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Randomised controlled trial of intensive multifactorial treatment for cardiovascular risk in patients with screen-detected type 2 diabetes: 1-year data from the ADDITION Netherlands study.

Authors:  Paul Gh Janssen; Kees J Gorter; Ronald P Stolk; Guy Ehm Rutten
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Screening for diabetes.

Authors:  Beverley Balkau
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  Recommendations on screening for type 2 diabetes in adults.

Authors:  Kevin Pottie; Alejandra Jaramillo; Gabriela Lewin; Jim Dickinson; Neil Bell; Paula Brauer; Lesley Dunfield; Michel Joffres; Harminder Singh; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Health-related quality of life of diabetic foot ulcer patients and their caregivers.

Authors:  M H Nabuurs-Franssen; M S P Huijberts; A C Nieuwenhuijzen Kruseman; J Willems; N C Schaper
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-07-02       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  The diagnosis of asymptomatic disease is associated with fewer healthy days: A cross sectional analysis from the national health and nutrition examination survey.

Authors:  Janel Hanmer; Lan Yu; Jie Li; Dio Kavalieratos; Laurel Peterson; Rachel Hess
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2018-09-28

8.  How can we identify candidates at highest risk--to screen or not to screen?

Authors:  N C Barengo; J O Tuomilehto
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.443

9.  Impact of diagnosis of diabetes on health-related quality of life among high risk individuals: the Diabetes Prevention Program outcomes study.

Authors:  D Marrero; Q Pan; E Barrett-Connor; M de Groot; P Zhang; C Percy; H Florez; R Ackermann; M Montez; R R Rubin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-05-26       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Long-term effect of population screening for diabetes on cardiovascular morbidity, self-rated health, and health behavior.

Authors:  Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui; Rebecca K Simmons; A Toby Prevost; Kate M Williams; Ann-Louise Kinmonth; Nicholas J Wareham; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.