Literature DB >> 12032103

The performance of a risk score in predicting undiagnosed hyperglycemia.

P J Park1, S J Griffin, L Sargeant, N J Wareham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Type 2 diabetes is a serious disease that is commonly undetected and for which screening is sometimes advocated. A number of risk factors are associated with prevalent undiagnosed diabetes. The use of routinely available information on these factors has been proposed as a simple and effective way of identifying individuals at high risk for having the disease. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the Cambridge risk score in a large and representative population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A risk score derived from data in a previous study was tested for its ability to detect prevalent undiagnosed hyperglycemia as measured by a GHb > or = 6.0, 6.5, or 7% in 6,567 subjects aged 39-78 years in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer-Norfolk cohort.
RESULTS: For a specificity of 78%, the risk score predicted a GHb of > or = 7.0% in subjects aged 39-78 years, with a sensitivity of 51% (95% CI 40-62). The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve for GHb > or = 6.0, 6.5, and 7% were 65.7% (63.8-67.6), 71.2% (68.4-75.2), and 74.2% (69.5-79.0), respectively. The area under the ROC curve was not significantly reduced if data on family and smoking history were unavailable for any of the cut-offs for GHb.
CONCLUSIONS: The risk score performed as well as other previously reported models in all age groups. We concluded that a simple risk score using data routinely available in primary care can identify people with an elevated GHb with reasonable sensitivity and specificity, and it could therefore form part of a strategy for early detection of type 2 diabetes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12032103     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.25.6.984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  29 in total

1.  Evaluation of a risk factor scoring model in screening for undiagnosed diabetes in China population.

Authors:  Jian-jun Dong; Neng-jun Lou; Jia-jun Zhao; Zhong-wen Zhang; Lu-lu Qiu; Ying Zhou; Lin Liao
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.066

2.  Sequential screening for diabetes--evaluation of a campaign in Swiss community pharmacies.

Authors:  Kurt E Hersberger; Andrea Botomino; Maxime Mancini; Rudolf Bruppacher
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2006-09-27

3.  Strategies to identify adults at high risk for type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes Prevention Program.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 4.  Nonpharmacological interventions for the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Peter E Schwarz; Colin J Greaves; Jaana Lindström; Thomas Yates; Melanie J Davies
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  A prediction model for type 2 diabetes risk among Chinese people.

Authors:  K Chien; T Cai; H Hsu; T Su; W Chang; M Chen; Y Lee; F B Hu
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  Rationale and design of the ADDITION-Leicester study, a systematic screening programme and randomised controlled trial of multi-factorial cardiovascular risk intervention in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus detected by screening.

Authors:  D R Webb; K Khunti; B Srinivasan; L J Gray; N Taub; S Campbell; J Barnett; J Henson; S Hiles; A Farooqi; S J Griffin; N J Wareham; M J Davies
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  A new public health tool for risk assessment of abnormal glucose levels.

Authors:  Guozhong He; Tetine Sentell; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 2.830

8.  Prediction model for high glycated hemoglobin concentration among ethnic Chinese in Taiwan.

Authors:  Kuo-Liong Chien; Hung-Ju Lin; Bai-Chin Lee; Hsiu-Ching Hsu; Ming-Fong Chen
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 9.951

9.  Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): trial protocol.

Authors:  Eleanor Mann; A Toby Prevost; Simon Griffin; Ian Kellar; Stephen Sutton; Michael Parker; Simon Sanderson; Ann Louise Kinmonth; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  The ADDITION-Cambridge trial protocol: a cluster -- randomised controlled trial of screening for type 2 diabetes and intensive treatment for screen-detected patients.

Authors:  Justin B Echouffo-Tcheugui; Rebecca K Simmons; Kate M Williams; Roslyn S Barling; A Toby Prevost; Ann Louise Kinmonth; Nicholas J Wareham; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.