OBJECTIVES: To determine the perioperative morbidity of performing a concurrent pubovaginal sling with prolapse repair in women with occult (or potential) stress incontinence, particularly on voiding dysfunction and emptying. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 38 women with grade 3-4 pelvic prolapse and occult stress incontinence. All patients underwent video urodynamic testing with the prolapse unreduced and again with the prolapse reduced with a pessary or packing. The abdominal leak point pressure was determined. Appropriate surgical repair of all components of the prolapse was performed concurrently with pubovaginal sling placement. The outcomes were measured with respect to the time to spontaneous voiding, permanent urinary retention, development of stress incontinence or de novo urge incontinence, resolution of urge incontinence, and perioperative complications. RESULTS: The mean age was 72 years, and the mean follow-up was 15 months (range 6 to 39). The mean time required before spontaneous voiding resumed without the need for catheterization was 11.8 days (range 2 to 46). No patient developed permanent urinary retention. Two (9.5%) of 21 women without preoperative urge incontinence developed de novo urge incontinence. However, existing urge incontinence resolved in 45%. One woman developed a suprapubic wound infection, which resolved with conservative management. Stress incontinence occurred in 2 women (7%) at 4 and 19 months postoperatively. Clinically significant prolapse (uterine) developed in 1 patient 2 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous pubovaginal sling placement for women with occult stress incontinence undergoing repair of a large pelvic prolapse is effective in preventing postoperative stress incontinence and has little negative effect on postoperative bladder emptying. It should be considered in all women with occult stress incontinence undergoing prolapse repair.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the perioperative morbidity of performing a concurrent pubovaginal sling with prolapse repair in women with occult (or potential) stress incontinence, particularly on voiding dysfunction and emptying. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 38 women with grade 3-4 pelvic prolapse and occult stress incontinence. All patients underwent video urodynamic testing with the prolapse unreduced and again with the prolapse reduced with a pessary or packing. The abdominal leak point pressure was determined. Appropriate surgical repair of all components of the prolapse was performed concurrently with pubovaginal sling placement. The outcomes were measured with respect to the time to spontaneous voiding, permanent urinary retention, development of stress incontinence or de novo urge incontinence, resolution of urge incontinence, and perioperative complications. RESULTS: The mean age was 72 years, and the mean follow-up was 15 months (range 6 to 39). The mean time required before spontaneous voiding resumed without the need for catheterization was 11.8 days (range 2 to 46). No patient developed permanent urinary retention. Two (9.5%) of 21 women without preoperative urge incontinence developed de novo urge incontinence. However, existing urge incontinence resolved in 45%. One woman developed a suprapubic wound infection, which resolved with conservative management. Stress incontinence occurred in 2 women (7%) at 4 and 19 months postoperatively. Clinically significant prolapse (uterine) developed in 1 patient 2 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous pubovaginal sling placement for women with occult stress incontinence undergoing repair of a large pelvic prolapse is effective in preventing postoperative stress incontinence and has little negative effect on postoperative bladder emptying. It should be considered in all women with occult stress incontinence undergoing prolapse repair.
Authors: Toby C Chai; Kimberly Kenton; Yan Xu; Larry Sirls; Halina Zyczynski; Tracey S Wilson; David D Rahn; Emily L Whitcomb; Yvonne Hsu; Elizabeth A Gormley Journal: Urology Date: 2012-04-25 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Lore Schierlitz; Peter L Dwyer; Anna Rosamilia; Alison De Souza; Christine Murray; Elizabeth Thomas; Richard Hiscock; Chahin Achtari Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 2.894