Literature DB >> 12031138

Sitting height and subischial leg length centile curves for boys and girls from Southeast England.

A D Dangour1, S Schilg, J A Hulse, T J Cole.   

Abstract

PRIMARY
OBJECTIVES: The only reference centile curves currently available for body proportions of children in the UK were constructed more than 20 years ago by Tanner and Whitehouse. The current study was designed to produce up-to-date sitting height and subischial leg length centile curves for boys and girls in Southeast England. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A convenience sample of 1424 boys and 1208 girls aged under 25 years from Southeast England was measured by a single observer in 1995-1996. Using Cole's LMS method, centile curves were constructed for sitting height and subischial leg length, and the medians by age and sex were then scaled to sum to the corresponding median height of the British 1990 reference.
RESULTS: The new centile curves for boys and girls are presented. They differ significantly from those of Tanner and Whitehouse in leg length (boys p < 0.001; girls p < 0.01), but not in sitting height.
CONCLUSIONS: The Tanner and Whitehouse reference curves for body segment length are not suitable for contemporary British children, whose legs are longer than they were a generation ago. It is proposed that the curves presented here be adopted provisionally as the new British reference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12031138     DOI: 10.1080/03014460110085331

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hum Biol        ISSN: 0301-4460            Impact factor:   1.533


  12 in total

Review 1.  Pediatric brain tumor treatment: growth consequences and their management.

Authors:  Sogol Mostoufi-Moab; Adda Grimberg
Journal:  Pediatr Endocrinol Rev       Date:  2010-09

2.  Sitting height and sitting height/height ratio references for Turkish children.

Authors:  Rüveyde Bundak; Firdevs Bas; Andrzej Furman; Hülya Günöz; Feyza Darendeliler; Nurçin Saka; Sükran Poyrazoğlu; Olcay Neyzi
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Nationwide age references for sitting height, leg length, and sitting height/height ratio, and their diagnostic value for disproportionate growth disorders.

Authors:  A M Fredriks; S van Buuren; W J M van Heel; R H M Dijkman-Neerincx; S P Verloove-Vanhorick; J M Wit
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Endocrine outcome in children with medulloblastoma treated with 18 Gy of craniospinal radiation therapy.

Authors:  Weizhen Xu; Anna Janss; Roger J Packer; Peter Phillips; Joel Goldwein; Thomas Moshang
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  Height, ethnicity, and the incidence of diabetes: the San Antonio Heart Study.

Authors:  Carlos Lorenzo; Ken Williams; Michael P Stern; Steven M Haffner
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 8.694

6.  Attainment of peak bone mass at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and radius in men and women: relative contributions of bone size and volumetric bone mineral density.

Authors:  Yvette M Henry; Diana Fatayerji; Richard Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-02-24       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Sitting Height to Standing Height Ratio Reference Charts for Children in the United States.

Authors:  Colin Patrick Hawkes; Sogol Mostoufi-Moab; Shana E McCormack; Adda Grimberg; Babette S Zemel
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 6.314

8.  Tanner's tempo of growth in adolescence: recent SITAR insights with the Harpenden Growth Study and ALSPAC.

Authors:  T J Cole
Journal:  Ann Hum Biol       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.533

9.  Is femur length the key height component in risk prediction of type 2 diabetes among adults?

Authors:  Jian Liu; Hongzhuan Tan; Brian Jeynes
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-01-26       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Short leg length, a marker of early childhood deprivation, is associated with metabolic disorders underlying type 2 diabetes: the PROMISE cohort study.

Authors:  Luke W Johnston; Stewart B Harris; Ravi Retnakaran; Hertzel C Gerstein; Bernard Zinman; Jill Hamilton; Anthony J Hanley
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 19.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.