Literature DB >> 12030836

Combining brains: a survey of methods for statistical pooling of information.

Nicole A Lazar1, Beatriz Luna, John A Sweeney, William F Eddy.   

Abstract

More than one subject is scanned in a typical functional brain imaging experiment. How can the scientist make best use of the acquired data to map the specific areas of the brain that become active during the performance of different tasks? It is clear that we can gain both scientific and statistical power by pooling the images from multiple subjects; furthermore, for the comparison of groups of subjects (clinical patients vs healthy controls, children of different ages, left-handed people vs right-handed people, as just some examples), it is essential to have a "group map" to represent each population and to form the basis of a statistical test. While the importance of combining images for these purposes has been recognized, there has not been an organized attempt on the part of neuroscientists to understand the different statistical approaches to this problem, which have various strengths and weaknesses. In this paper we review some popular methods for combining information, and demonstrate the surveyed techniques on a sample data set. Given a combination of brain images, the researcher needs to interpret the result and decide on areas of activation; the question of thresholding is critical here and is also explored. 2002 Elsevier Science (USA)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12030836     DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  85 in total

1.  Where is ELSA? The early to late shift in aging.

Authors:  Ilana T Z Dew; Norbou Buchler; Ian G Dobbins; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Age-related neural differences in affiliation and isolation.

Authors:  Janelle N Beadle; Carolyn Yoon; Angela H Gutchess
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging changes during relational retrieval in normal aging and amnestic mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Kelly S Giovanello; Felipe De Brigard; Jaclyn Hennessey Ford; Daniel I Kaufer; James R Burke; Jeffrey N Browndyke; Kathleen A Welsh-Bohmer
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  Brain-derived neurotrophic factor val66met polymorphism and hippocampal activation during episodic encoding and retrieval tasks.

Authors:  Nancy A Dennis; Roberto Cabeza; Anna C Need; Sheena Waters-Metenier; David B Goldstein; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.899

5.  Integrative Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging-genetic data with application to cocaine dependence.

Authors:  Shabnam Azadeh; Brian P Hobbs; Liangsuo Ma; David A Nielsen; F Gerard Moeller; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Age-related changes in prefrontal and hippocampal contributions to relational encoding.

Authors:  Donna Rose Addis; Kelly S Giovanello; Mai-Anh Vu; Daniel L Schacter
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Overlap between the neural correlates of cued recall and source memory: evidence for a generic recollection network?

Authors:  Hiroki R Hayama; Kaia L Vilberg; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Cortical regions associated with different aspects of object recognition performance.

Authors:  Jane E Joseph; Alison B Farley
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  The coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging data.

Authors:  Pantelis Samartsidis; Silvia Montagna; Thomas E Nichols; Timothy D Johnson
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.901

10.  Region of interest template for the human basal ganglia: comparing EPI and standardized space approaches.

Authors:  Janey Prodoehl; Hong Yu; Deborah M Little; Ivy Abraham; David E Vaillancourt
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.