Literature DB >> 12030309

Interrater reliability of neuropsychological diagnoses: a Department of Veterans Affairs cooperative study.

Roberta F White1, Kenneth E James, Jennifer J Vasterling, Karen Marans, Richard Delaney, Maxine Krengel, Fredric Rose.   

Abstract

This study examined the interrater reliability of neuropsychological diagnoses produced by clinical neuropsychologists across 4 medical centers. These diagnoses were based on evaluations using a comprehensive battery of commonly used neuropsychological test instruments, interview, history and medical chart review. The diagnoses of individual neuropsychologists were compared to those made by members of an external review panel for each patient evaluated. Patients were first diagnosed as showing cognitive impairment versus no cognitive impairment. If a patient was diagnosed as impaired, a specific neuropsychological diagnosis was assigned. The diagnostic classification for cognitive impairment was moderately reliable [kappa = .48 +/- s.e.(kappa) = .062]. The interrater reliability for specific diagnoses was in the fair to good range [kappa = .44 +/- s.e.(kappa) = .029]. These levels of reliability are comparable to those found for other psychiatric and neurologic specialties and for medical diagnoses made by other health care disciplines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12030309     DOI: 10.1017/s1355617702814333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc        ISSN: 1355-6177            Impact factor:   2.892


  1 in total

1.  Variation in adherence to new quality-of-care indicators for the acute rehabilitation of children with traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Frederick P Rivara; Stephanie K Ennis; Rita Mangione-Smith; Ellen J MacKenzie; Kenneth M Jaffe
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.966

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.