C Paugam-Burtz1, H Dupont, J-P Marmuse, D Chosidow, L Malek, J-M Desmonts, J Mantz. 1. Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical ICU, Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Bichat-Claude Bernard, 46 Rue Henri Huchard, 75018 Paris, France. catherine.paugam@bch.ap-hop-paris.fr
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the time-course of two organ failure scores (SOFA and Goris) after surgery for postoperative peritonitis in critically ill patients according to the persistence/nonpersistence of intraabdominal sepsis (IAS). DESIGN: Retrospective study. PATIENTS: Sixty-two consecutive patients (SAPSII = 38+/-14) admitted in the surgical ICU. METHODS: Patients were classified according to the persistence of IAS (IAS+, n=36) confirmed by a second laparotomy or the lack of IAS (IAS-, n=26) assessed by a favorable 30-day evolution without reintervention. Scores were calculated daily from day 0 preoperatively to postoperative day 5. RESULTS: In both groups, SOFA scores were higher on day 1 when compared to day 0 (8.3+/-3.1 vs 6.1+/-3.7 in the IAS+ group and 5.2+/-3.4 vs 2.7+/-2.7 in the IAS- group). In the IAS- patients, the SOFA score displayed a decrease starting on day 2 when compared to day 1 (4.4+/-3.6 vs 5.2+/-3.4, P=0.03). In contrast, in the IAS+ patients, the SOFA score remained unchanged until day 5. The time course of the Goris score was strictly similar to the SOFA scores. CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients with postoperative peritonitis, the postoperative time course of the SOFA and the Goris organ failure scores was different between patients with or without intra-abdominal persistent sepsis. The lack of improvement of one of these scores on postoperative day 2 may suggest persistent intraabdominal sepsis and supports the need for a new surgical exploration.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the time-course of two organ failure scores (SOFA and Goris) after surgery for postoperative peritonitis in critically illpatients according to the persistence/nonpersistence of intraabdominal sepsis (IAS). DESIGN: Retrospective study. PATIENTS: Sixty-two consecutive patients (SAPSII = 38+/-14) admitted in the surgical ICU. METHODS:Patients were classified according to the persistence of IAS (IAS+, n=36) confirmed by a second laparotomy or the lack of IAS (IAS-, n=26) assessed by a favorable 30-day evolution without reintervention. Scores were calculated daily from day 0 preoperatively to postoperative day 5. RESULTS: In both groups, SOFA scores were higher on day 1 when compared to day 0 (8.3+/-3.1 vs 6.1+/-3.7 in the IAS+ group and 5.2+/-3.4 vs 2.7+/-2.7 in the IAS- group). In the IAS- patients, the SOFA score displayed a decrease starting on day 2 when compared to day 1 (4.4+/-3.6 vs 5.2+/-3.4, P=0.03). In contrast, in the IAS+ patients, the SOFA score remained unchanged until day 5. The time course of the Goris score was strictly similar to the SOFA scores. CONCLUSION: In critically illpatients with postoperative peritonitis, the postoperative time course of the SOFA and the Goris organ failure scores was different between patients with or without intra-abdominal persistent sepsis. The lack of improvement of one of these scores on postoperative day 2 may suggest persistent intraabdominal sepsis and supports the need for a new surgical exploration.
Authors: Seija Sipola; Hannu Syrjälä; Vesa Koivukangas; Jouko J Laurila; Pasi Ohtonen; Juha Saarnio; Tero I Ala-Kokko Journal: World J Surg Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Colin L Verdant; Marialuisa Chierego; Véronique De Moor; Reza Chamlou; Jacques Creteur; Jean de Dieu Mutijima; Patricia Loi; Michel Gelin; Antonino Gullo; Jean-Louis Vincent; Daniel De Backer Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Ascanio Tridente; Geraldine M Clarke; Andrew Walden; Anthony C Gordon; Paula Hutton; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Paul A H Holloway; Gary H Mills; Julian Bion; Frank Stüber; Christopher Garrard; Charles Hinds Journal: Crit Care Date: 2015-05-05 Impact factor: 9.097