Literature DB >> 12029189

Comparative overview of cardiac output measurement methods: has impedance cardiography come of age?

A N De Maria1, A Raisinghani.   

Abstract

Cardiac output, usually expressed as liters of blood ejected by the left ventricle per minute, is a fundamental measure of the adequacy of myocardial function to meet the perfusion needs of tissue at any time. Decreases in cardiac output over time (when cardiac output is measured under similar conditions) may signal myocardial functional deterioration and the onset or progression of heart failure. Conversely, improvements in cardiac output may indicate a positive response to medical therapy. However, most methods for evaluating cardiac output are technically demanding, require specialized training and specialized environments for measurement, and are costly. Therefore, most measurement techniques are impractical for routine evaluation of disease progression and/or response to treatment in the prevention and/or management of heart failure. This paper provides a comparative overview of commonly employed cardiac output measurement strategies with emphasis on developments in impedance cardiography which suggest that impedance cardiography has the potential to make routine assessment and trending of cardiac output a viable alternative to assist in the management of both chronically and acutely ill patients, including those with heart failure. (c)2000 by CHF, Inc.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 12029189     DOI: 10.1111/j.1527-5299.2000.80139.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Congest Heart Fail        ISSN: 1527-5299


  5 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of resistant hypertension.

Authors:  Sandra J Taler
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.369

2.  Stroke volume and cardiac output measurement in cardiac patients during a rehabilitation program: comparison between tonometry, impedancemetry and echocardiography.

Authors:  Alicia Gonzalez-Represas; Laurent Mourot
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 2.357

3.  Beat-to-beat estimation of stroke volume using impedance cardiography and artificial neural network.

Authors:  S M M Naidu; Prem C Pandey; Uttam R Bagal; Suhas P Hardas
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Circadian hemodynamics in men and women with high blood pressure: dipper vs. nondipper and racial differences.

Authors:  Andrew Sherwood; LaBarron K Hill; James A Blumenthal; Alan L Hinderliter
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.844

5.  Invasive versus non-invasive assessment of valvuloarterial impedance in severe aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Lisa Stanberry; Aisha Ahmed; Paul Sorajja; Joao L Cavalcante; Mario Gossl
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2020-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.