BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the use of dendritic cells (DCs) for treatment of malignancy and infectious disease. Our goal was to develop a clinical scale method to prepare autologous DCs for cancer clinical trials. METHODS: PBMC were collected from normal donors or cancer patients by automated leukapheresis, purified by counterflow centrifugal elutriation and placed into culture in polystyrene flasks at 1 x 10(6) cells/mL for 5-7 days at 37 degrees C, with 5% CO(2), with IL-4 and GM-CSF. Conditions investigated included media formulation, supplementation with heat in activated allogeneic AB serum or autologous plasma and time to harvest (Day 5 or Day 7). DCs were evaluated for morphology, quantitative yield, viability, phenotype and function, including mixed leukocyte response and recall response to tetanus toxoid and influenza virus. RESULTS: DCs with a typical immature phenotype (CD14-negative, CD1a-positive, mannose receptor-positive, CD80-positive, CD83-negative) were generated most consistently in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% allogeneic AB serum or 10% autologous plasma. Cell yield was higher at Day 5 than Day 7, without detectable differences in phenotype or function. In pediatric sarcoma patients, autologous DCs had enhanced function compared with monocytes from which they were generated. In this patient group, starting with 8.0 +/- 3.7 x 10(8) fresh or cryopreserved autologous monocytes, DC yield was 2.1 +/- 1.0 x 10(8) cells, or 29% of the starting monocyte number. DISCUSSION: In the optimized clinical-scale method, purified peripheral monocytes are cultured for 5 days in flasks at 1 x 10(6) cells/mL in RPMI 1640, 10% allogeneic AB serum or autologous plasma, IL-4 and GM-CSF. This method avoids the use of FBS and results in immature DCs suitable for clinical trials.
BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the use of dendritic cells (DCs) for treatment of malignancy and infectious disease. Our goal was to develop a clinical scale method to prepare autologous DCs for cancer clinical trials. METHODS: PBMC were collected from normal donors or cancerpatients by automated leukapheresis, purified by counterflow centrifugal elutriation and placed into culture in polystyrene flasks at 1 x 10(6) cells/mL for 5-7 days at 37 degrees C, with 5% CO(2), with IL-4 and GM-CSF. Conditions investigated included media formulation, supplementation with heat in activated allogeneic AB serum or autologous plasma and time to harvest (Day 5 or Day 7). DCs were evaluated for morphology, quantitative yield, viability, phenotype and function, including mixed leukocyte response and recall response to tetanus toxoid and influenza virus. RESULTS: DCs with a typical immature phenotype (CD14-negative, CD1a-positive, mannose receptor-positive, CD80-positive, CD83-negative) were generated most consistently in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% allogeneic AB serum or 10% autologous plasma. Cell yield was higher at Day 5 than Day 7, without detectable differences in phenotype or function. In pediatric sarcomapatients, autologous DCs had enhanced function compared with monocytes from which they were generated. In this patient group, starting with 8.0 +/- 3.7 x 10(8) fresh or cryopreserved autologous monocytes, DC yield was 2.1 +/- 1.0 x 10(8) cells, or 29% of the starting monocyte number. DISCUSSION: In the optimized clinical-scale method, purified peripheral monocytes are cultured for 5 days in flasks at 1 x 10(6) cells/mL in RPMI 1640, 10% allogeneic AB serum or autologous plasma, IL-4 and GM-CSF. This method avoids the use of FBS and results in immature DCs suitable for clinical trials.
Authors: Jeong Won Shin; Ping Jin; Yong Fan; Stefanie Slezak; Virginia David-Ocampo; Hanh M Khuu; Elizabeth J Read; Ena Wang; Francesco M Marincola; David F Stroncek Journal: Transfusion Date: 2008-02-12 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Crystal L Mackall; Eunice H Rhee; Elizabeth J Read; Hanh M Khuu; Susan F Leitman; Donna Bernstein; Merertu Tesso; Lauren M Long; David Grindler; Margret Merino; William Kopp; Maria Tsokos; Jay A Berzofsky; Lee J Helman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Nirali N Shah; David M Loeb; Hahn Khuu; David Stroncek; Tolu Ariyo; Mark Raffeld; Cindy Delbrook; Crystal L Mackall; Alan S Wayne; Terry J Fry Journal: Biol Blood Marrow Transplant Date: 2016-09-12 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: A Escobar; M López; A Serrano; M Ramirez; C Pérez; A Aguirre; R González; J Alfaro; M Larrondo; M Fodor; C Ferrada; F Salazar-Onfray Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Alexandra J Dickinson; Sally A Hunsucker; Paul M Armistead; Nancy L Allbritton Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem Date: 2014-07-01 Impact factor: 4.142
Authors: Ping Jin; Tae Hee Han; Jiaqiang Ren; Stefanie Saunders; Ena Wang; Francesco M Marincola; David F Stroncek Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 5.531