Literature DB >> 12028390

Teaching medical students exposure therapy for phobia/panic - randomized, controlled comparison of face-to-face tutorial in small groups vs. solo computer instruction.

Michael McDonough1, Isaac M Marks.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the teaching value of one session of computer-guided solo instruction in exposure therapy for phobias with that of one face-to-face small-group tutorial.
DESIGN: Non-blind, randomized, controlled study.
SETTING: King's College Hospital Medical School, London. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-seven third-year medical students and 11 behaviour therapists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Seventy-five true/false multiple choice questions relating to (b) below answered at pre- and post-teaching by students and just once by behaviour therapists to obtain 'expert' scores; pre- and post-teaching ratings of interest in behaviour therapy and post-teaching ratings of educational and enjoyment value. EDUCATIONAL
INTERVENTIONS: (a) All students had a 20-minute group lecture on basic concepts and historical aspects just before randomization to: (b) 90 min of either solo computer or group face-to-face tutorial teaching. Computer instruction used a short version of 'FearFighter'- a self-help computer system for people suffering from phobias.
RESULTS: Solo computer instruction taught exposure therapy principles effectively but improved multiple choice question scores marginally less than did small-group tutorial teaching. Tutorial teaching required 5 times more teacher time but led to knowledge scores that did not differ significantly from those of behaviour therapists. Students clearly rated face-to-face small-group tutorial teaching as more enjoyable.
CONCLUSION: The knowledge gain from a solo computer session resembled that from a small-group face-to-face tutorial, and required far less teacher time, but was less enjoyable. Enjoyment might rise if the computer session was group-oriented and aimed at students rather than patients. In general computer teaching might be best used to complement rather than replace conventional teaching.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12028390     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01210.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Educ        ISSN: 0308-0110            Impact factor:   6.251


  10 in total

1.  Exposing clinicians to exposure: a randomized controlled dissemination trial of exposure therapy for anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Melanie S Harned; Linda A Dimeff; Eric A Woodcock; Tim Kelly; Jake Zavertnik; Ignacio Contreras; Sankirtana M Danner
Journal:  Behav Ther       Date:  2014-05-05

2.  Overcoming barriers to disseminating exposure therapies for anxiety disorders: a pilot randomized controlled trial of training methods.

Authors:  Melanie S Harned; Linda A Dimeff; Eric A Woodcock; Julie M Skutch
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2011-03

3.  Predicting adoption of exposure therapy in a randomized controlled dissemination trial.

Authors:  Melanie S Harned; Linda A Dimeff; Eric A Woodcock; Ignacio Contreras
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2013-03-04

4.  Offline Digital Education for Medical Students: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.

Authors:  Bhone Myint Kyaw; Pawel Posadzki; Gerard Dunleavy; Monika Semwal; Ushashree Divakar; Vasilis Hervatis; Lorainne Tudor Car
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 5.428

5.  Using Self-Guided Treatment Software (ePST) to Teach Clinicians How to Deliver Problem-Solving Treatment for Depression.

Authors:  James A Cartreine; Trina E Chang; Janette L Seville; Luis Sandoval; John B Moore; Shuai Xu; Mark T Hegel
Journal:  Depress Res Treat       Date:  2012-11-14

6.  Comparison of a web-based package with tutor-based methods of teaching respiratory medicine: subjective and objective evaluations.

Authors:  Susan F Smith; Nicola J Roberts; Martyn R Partridge
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Offline eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction.

Authors:  Kristine Rasmussen; José Marcano Belisario; Petra A Wark; Joseph Antonio Molina; Stewart Lee Loong; Ziva Cotic; Nikos Papachristou; Eva Riboli-Sasco; Lorainne Tudor Car; Eve Marie Musulanov; Holger Kunz; Yanfeng Zhang; Pradeep Paul George; Bee Hoon Heng; Erica Lynette Wheeler; Najeeb Al Shorbaji; Igor Svab; Rifat Atun; Azeem Majeed; Josip Car
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.413

8.  Self-directed learning can outperform direct instruction in the course of a modern German medical curriculum - results of a mixed methods trial.

Authors:  Arne Peine; Klaus Kabino; Cord Spreckelsen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Effectiveness of training methods for delivery of evidence-based psychotherapies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Helen Valenstein-Mah; Nancy Greer; Lauren McKenzie; Lucas Hansen; Thad Q Strom; Shannon Wiltsey Stirman; Timothy J Wilt; Shannon M Kehle-Forbes
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 7.327

Review 10.  A randomised controlled study of face-to-face versus internet-based teaching of CBT skills for healthcare professionals in Sudan.

Authors:  Ahmed Ismail; Sarah Rakovshik; Sarah Abdelrahim
Journal:  BJPsych Int       Date:  2021-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.