OBJECTIVES: To determine whether decreased lower extremity strength contributes to trip-related falls in older adults. DESIGN: A cross-sectional sample of older adults were safety-harnessed and tripped while walking using a concealed, mechanical obstacle. Lower extremity strength was compared between trip outcome groups. SETTING: A biomechanics research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-nine healthy, community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older (50 women). MEASUREMENTS: Ankle, knee, and hip flexion and extension strength were measured isometrically and isokinetically. Measured strengths were subjected to a factor analysis. Strength factor scores were compared between those who recovered from the trip and those who fell by three previously identified mechanisms: during-step, after-step, and elevating-response falls. RESULTS: Seven common factors, one associated with each direction of exertion at each joint and one with the time rate of moment increase, explained 88% of the variance in measured strength. The during-step (n=5) fallers were significantly stronger in the ankle extension (plantarflexion), knee flexion, overall extension, and total strength factors than those who successfully recovered using a similar, lowering strategy (n=26). The elevating-response faller (n=1) was stronger in the plantarflexion and overall extension factors than most of those who recovered using a similar, elevating strategy (n=11). Two of three after-step fallers were among the weakest subjects tested. CONCLUSION: Weak older adults and the strongest older adults may be at greater risk of falling from a trip, although by different mechanisms. High strength may increase the likelihood of a during-step or elevating-response fall; decreased strength may increase the likelihood of an after-step fall.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether decreased lower extremity strength contributes to trip-related falls in older adults. DESIGN: A cross-sectional sample of older adults were safety-harnessed and tripped while walking using a concealed, mechanical obstacle. Lower extremity strength was compared between trip outcome groups. SETTING: A biomechanics research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-nine healthy, community-dwelling adults aged 65 and older (50 women). MEASUREMENTS: Ankle, knee, and hip flexion and extension strength were measured isometrically and isokinetically. Measured strengths were subjected to a factor analysis. Strength factor scores were compared between those who recovered from the trip and those who fell by three previously identified mechanisms: during-step, after-step, and elevating-response falls. RESULTS: Seven common factors, one associated with each direction of exertion at each joint and one with the time rate of moment increase, explained 88% of the variance in measured strength. The during-step (n=5) fallers were significantly stronger in the ankle extension (plantarflexion), knee flexion, overall extension, and total strength factors than those who successfully recovered using a similar, lowering strategy (n=26). The elevating-response faller (n=1) was stronger in the plantarflexion and overall extension factors than most of those who recovered using a similar, elevating strategy (n=11). Two of three after-step fallers were among the weakest subjects tested. CONCLUSION: Weak older adults and the strongest older adults may be at greater risk of falling from a trip, although by different mechanisms. High strength may increase the likelihood of a during-step or elevating-response fall; decreased strength may increase the likelihood of an after-step fall.
Authors: Matteo Cesari; Marco Pahor; Fulvio Lauretani; Brenda W H J Penninx; Benedetta Bartali; Roberto Russo; Antonio Cherubini; Richard Woodman; Stefania Bandinelli; Jack M Guralnik; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2004-09-28 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Mark C Perry; Serena F Carville; I Christopher H Smith; Olga M Rutherford; Di J Newham Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2006-07-18 Impact factor: 3.346