Literature DB >> 12024842

[Vasectomy. A prospective, randomized trial of vasectomy with bilateral incision versus the Li vasectomy].

Peter Christensen1, Omar A K al-Aqidi, Frank Svendsen Jensen, Torben Dørflinger.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Studies have shown that the Li vasectomy can match the effectiveness of and reduce the duration of operation and rate of complications compared to standard vasectomy with bilateral incision.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, randomised trial was conducted to compare the Li vasectomy with the standard vasectomy with bilateral incision. Data regarding effectiveness, time of operation, the patient's pain and discomfort, and peroperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Overall, 99 patients were entered in the trial, 51 with vasectomy with bilateral incision, 48 with the Li vasectomy.
RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the two methods with regard to effectiveness, time of operation, the patient's pain and discomfort, and peroperative and postoperative complications. Overall, vasectomy was inadequate in 5%, haematoma was found in 13%, infection in 9%, and scrotal pain or painful ejaculation in 9%. DISCUSSION: The Li vasectomy can be learned and practiced under routine conditions by residents in training with the same effectiveness and the same rate of complications as standard vasectomy with bilateral incision. The total morbidity was at the same level as in previous Danish studies, but higher than in the international studies with the Li vasectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12024842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ugeskr Laeger        ISSN: 0041-5782


  8 in total

1.  Vasectomy update 2010.

Authors:  Armand Zini
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Scalpel versus no-scalpel incision for vasectomy.

Authors:  Lynley A Cook; Asha Pun; Maria F Gallo; Laureen M Lopez; Huib A A M Van Vliet
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-03-30

3.  CUA guideline: Vasectomy.

Authors:  Armand Zini; John Grantmyre; Peter Chan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Long-term reproductive consequences of no-scalpel vasectomy in beagles.

Authors:  Yuanfeng Zhang; Xinggang Wang; Zonglin Chen; Xunbin Huang
Journal:  J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci       Date:  2012-12-28

5.  [Vasectomy : Current information].

Authors:  Thomas Kreutzig-Langenfeld; Ekaterina Lellig; Peter Hinz; Fabian Zilg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  UPDATE - 2022 Canadian Urological Association best practice report: Vasectomy.

Authors:  Armand Zini; John Grantmyre; Victor Chow; Peter Chan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.052

7.  Predictors of no-scalpel vasectomy acceptance in Karimnagar district, Andhra Pradesh.

Authors:  Sameer Valsangkar; Surendranath K Sai; Samir D Bele; Trupti N Bodhare
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-07

Review 8.  Vasectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review.

Authors:  Michel Labrecque; Caroline Dufresne; Mark A Barone; Karine St-Hilaire
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 8.775

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.