Literature DB >> 12023703

Initial postmarketing experience with crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab for treatment of rattlesnake envenomation.

Anne-Michelle Ruha1, Steven C Curry, Michael Beuhler, Ken Katz, Daniel E Brooks, Kimberlie A Graeme, Kevin Wallace, Richard Gerkin, Frank Lovecchio, Paul Wax, Brad Selden.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We describe our postmarketing experience with patients receiving Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab (CroFab; FabAV) antivenom for treatment of rattlesnake envenomation.
METHODS: The charts of 28 patients admitted between March 1 and September 9, 2001, with rattlesnake envenomation and treated with FabAV were reviewed for demographic information, time until antivenom treatment, laboratory findings, evidence of hypersensitivity reaction, length of hospital stay, and readmission to the hospital.
RESULTS: All patients had swelling, 20 patients had elevated prothrombin times (>14 seconds), 12 patients had low fibrinogen levels (<170 mg/dL), and 6 patients had thrombocytopenia (platelet count <120,000/mm(3)) on presentation. The total dose of FabAV ranged from 10 to 47 vials per patient. Hypofibrinogenemia was resistant to FabAV in some patients. On follow-up, recurrence of coagulopathy was detected in 3 patients, and recurrence of thrombocytopenia was detected in 1 patient. Two patients demonstrated delayed-onset severe thrombocytopenia. Recurrence or delayed-onset toxicity might have been underestimated because of incomplete follow-up in some patients. No acute hypersensitivity reactions occurred. Two patients reported mild symptoms of possible serum sickness on follow-up.
CONCLUSION: FabAV effectively controlled the effects of envenomation; however, initial control of coagulopathy was difficult to achieve in some cases, and recurrence or delayed-onset hematotoxicity was common. When initially managing hematotoxicity, a trend toward normalization of laboratory values might be a more reasonable end point for FabAV treatment than attainment of normal reference values in nonbleeding patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12023703     DOI: 10.1067/mem.2002.123698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  11 in total

Review 1.  Adverse reactions to snake antivenom, and their prevention and treatment.

Authors:  H Asita de Silva; Nicole M Ryan; H Janaka de Silva
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Successful treatment of South American rattlesnake (Crotalus durissus terrificus) envenomation with Crotalidae polyvalent immune Fab (CroFab™).

Authors:  Michael J Lynch; Seth C Ritter; Robert D Cannon
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2011-03

3.  Unified treatment algorithm for the management of crotaline snakebite in the United States: results of an evidence-informed consensus workshop.

Authors:  Eric J Lavonas; Anne-Michelle Ruha; William Banner; Vikhyat Bebarta; Jeffrey N Bernstein; Sean P Bush; William P Kerns; William H Richardson; Steven A Seifert; David A Tanen; Steve C Curry; Richard C Dart
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2011-02-03

4.  Coagulopathy: the most important thing we still don't know about snakebite.

Authors:  Eric J Lavonas
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2012-02

5.  Comparison of F(ab')2 versus Fab antivenom for pit viper envenomation: a prospective, blinded, multicenter, randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Sean P Bush; Anne-Michelle Ruha; Steven A Seifert; David L Morgan; Brandon J Lewis; Thomas C Arnold; Richard F Clark; William J Meggs; Eric A Toschlog; Stephen W Borron; Gary R Figge; Dawn R Sollee; Farshad M Shirazi; Robert Wolk; Ives de Chazal; Dan Quan; Walter García-Ubbelohde; Alejandro Alagón; Richard D Gerkin; Leslie V Boyer
Journal:  Clin Toxicol (Phila)       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 4.467

Review 6.  Preclinical Evaluation of the Efficacy of Antivenoms for Snakebite Envenoming: State-of-the-Art and Challenges Ahead.

Authors:  José María Gutiérrez; Gabriela Solano; Davinia Pla; María Herrera; Álvaro Segura; Mariángela Vargas; Mauren Villalta; Andrés Sánchez; Libia Sanz; Bruno Lomonte; Guillermo León; Juan J Calvete
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 7.  Crotaline Fab antivenom appears to be effective in cases of severe North American pit viper envenomation: an integrative review.

Authors:  Eric J Lavonas; Tammi H Schaeffer; Jamie Kokko; Sara L Mlynarchek; Gregory M Bogdan
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2009-06-22

8.  Prevalence of Acute Hypersensitivity Reactions in Pediatric Patients Receiving Crotalidae Polyvalent Immune Fab.

Authors:  Bryan Corbett; Jenna Otter; Clifford P Masom; Richard F Clark
Journal:  J Med Toxicol       Date:  2020-07-24

9.  Snakebite in Korea: A Guideline to Primary Surgical Management.

Authors:  Jung Ho Rha; Sung Min Kwon; Jin Rok Oh; Byung Keun Han; Kang Hyung Lee; Jae Hyun Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.759

Review 10.  Benefits of using heterologous polyclonal antibodies and potential applications to new and undertreated infectious pathogens.

Authors:  Rashmi Dixit; Jenny Herz; Richard Dalton; Robert Booy
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.641

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.