Literature DB >> 12023686

Differences in AT2 -receptor stimulation between AT1 -receptor blockers valsartan and losartan quantified by renal interstitial fluid cGMP.

Helmy M Siragy1, Mohamed A El-Kersh, Marc De Gasparo, Randy L Webb, Robert M Carey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Angiotensin II-receptor blockers are an established class of antihypertensive agents, but the differences between individual members of the class are largely unknown. The present study employed an animal model to demonstrate angiotensin II-receptor blocker-specific effects and to quantify these differences by comparing two common agents, losartan and valsartan.
METHODS: We measured the effects on angiotensin II AT2-receptor-mediated renal cGMP by microdialysis in the outer renal cortex in conscious normotensive, sodium-depleted, 4-week-old Sprague-Dawley rats. Rats (n = 8) were given equimolar and equidepressor doses of losartan (0.02 mmol/kg) or valsartan (0.02 mmol/kg) either intravenously or orally. Time was allowed for the conversion of losartan into its active metabolite, EXP 3174.
RESULTS: Both drugs had equal effects on blood pressure. There were significantly greater increases in cGMP levels after administration of valsartan than of losartan with both routes of administration. Intravenous administration of valsartan led to a 69.1% increase in cGMP, versus a 10.3% increase with losartan. Five hours after oral administration of valsartan, a 48% increase in cGMP was observed versus a 10.9% increase with losartan. The increase after oral administration of valsartan was sustained 8 h after administration, whereas the effect of losartan was not sustained. The effects of losartan and valsartan on cGMP were completely inhibited by AT2-receptor blockade.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that AT1-receptor blockade with valsartan influences AT2-receptor-mediated angiotensin II responses to a greater extent than with losartan, as quantified by renal interstitial fluid cGMP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12023686     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200206000-00028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  6 in total

Review 1.  Angiotensin AT2 receptors: cardiovascular hope or hype?

Authors:  Robert E Widdop; Emma S Jones; Ruth E Hannan; Tracey A Gaspari
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2003-10-06       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 2.  The role of angiotensin II-stimulated renal tubular transport in hypertension.

Authors:  Kevin D Burns; Ningjun Li
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.369

3.  High ambient glucose augments angiotensin II-induced proinflammatory gene mRNA expression in human mesangial cells: effects of valsartan and simvastatin.

Authors:  Masayo Naito; Ananth Shenoy; Isao Aoyama; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Radko Komers; H William Schnaper; Karol Bomsztyk
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 3.754

Review 4.  Vascular angiotensin II actions mediated by angiotensin II type 2 receptors.

Authors:  Ruth E Hannan; Robert E Widdop
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Long-Term Angiotensin II Infusion Induces Oxidative and Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Modulates Na+ Transporters Through the Nephron.

Authors:  Bruna Bezerra Lins; Fernando Augusto Malavazzi Casare; Flávia Ferreira Fontenele; Guilherme Lopes Gonçalves; Maria Oliveira-Souza
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Therapeutic and prognostic potential of GPCRs in prostate cancer from multi-omics landscape.

Authors:  Shiqi Li; Jianfang Chen; Xin Chen; Jin Yu; Yanzhi Guo; Menglong Li; Xuemei Pu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 5.988

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.