Literature DB >> 12023634

Safety, efficacy, and cost analysis of thymoglobulin induction therapy with intermittent dosing based on CD3+ lymphocyte counts in kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients.

V Ram Peddi1, Margaret Bryant, Prabir Roy-Chaudhury, E Steve Woodle, M Roy First.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In view of the superior T-cell depletion and prolonged half-life of thymoglobulin, we initiated a protocol to administer thymoglobulin intermittently based on peripheral blood CD3+ lymphocyte counts.
METHODS: In this prospective study, 41 consecutive high-risk cadaver transplant recipients (panel reactive antibody level >30%, repeat transplant recipients, simultaneous pancreas and kidney or pancreas after kidney recipients, prolonged cold-ischemia time, prolonged donor hypotension, non-heart-beating donors) who received thymoglobulin induction therapy were included. The first dose (1.5 mg/kg) of thymoglobulin was administered intraoperatively. CD3+ lymphocyte count in the peripheral blood was determined daily and repeat doses were administered when the CD3+ count was >20 cells/mm3. Calcineurin inhibitors (CI) in low doses were introduced when the allograft function recovered and the serum creatinine level dropped by at least 25% from the pretransplant level. Thymoglobulin treatment was discontinued once therapeutic CI drug levels were achieved. Concomitant immunosuppression consisted of mycophenolate mofetil and prednisone.
RESULTS: The mean individual thymoglobulin dose was 104 mg (1.4 mg/kg), and the total cumulative dose per patient was 318 mg (4.2 mg/kg). Patients received an average of three doses and a mean of six CD3 counts were obtained per patient. Introduction of CI was delayed for an average of 6 days posttransplantation. At a mean follow-up of 340 days, two (4.9%) patients died; three (7.3%) renal allografts and two (18.2%) pancreas allografts were lost. Five (12.2%) patients developed a total of six acute rejection episodes. The mean serum creatinine in the 38 patients with a functioning kidney was 1.47 mg/dl, and the mean blood glucose in the 9 pancreas allograft recipients was 89 mg/dl. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection occurred in one (2.4%) patient. No posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders were seen in this patient cohort. The hospital pharmacy charge for a 100-mg dose of thymoglobulin at this center was $2,165, and the laboratory charge for a single CD3 determination was $70. In this study, the average charges per patient for the total dose of thymoglobulin and six CD3 determinations were $7305. In comparison, the charge for daily administration of 104 mg of thymoglobulin (which was the mean dose) for 6 days (mean time to CI therapy initiation) would be $13,510 and for 10 days (mean time to therapeutic CI levels) would be $22,516. This represents a savings of 46% and 68%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Intermittent thymoglobulin therapy, based on peripheral blood CD3+ lymphocyte counts, is safe and associated with low acute rejection rate in high-risk kidney and kidney-pancreas transplant recipients. A mean of three doses resulted in adequate suppression of CD3+ lymphocytes permitting delayed introduction of CI in low doses until recovery of renal function occurred. When compared to traditional daily administration, intermittent therapy results in significant cost savings and reduces the total cumulative dose of this potent immunosuppressive agent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12023634     DOI: 10.1097/00007890-200205150-00025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  15 in total

Review 1.  Current state of renal transplant immunosuppression: Present and future.

Authors:  Hari Varun Kalluri; Karen L Hardinger
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2012-08-24

2.  Induction Therapy in Renal Transplantation: Why? What Agent? What Dose? We May Never Know.

Authors:  Alexander C Wiseman
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Adding thymoglobuline to the conventional immunosuppressant regimen in kidney transplantation: A cost-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Farshid Oliaei; Roghayeh Akbari; Ali Mohammad Ghazi Mirsaeid
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2012

Review 4.  Review on immunosuppression in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Maryam Moini; Michael L Schilsky; Eric M Tichy
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-06-08

5.  The Cost of Transplant Immunosuppressant Therapy: Is This Sustainable?

Authors:  Alexandra James; Roslyn B Mannon
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2015-06-01

6.  Thymoglobulin induction dosing strategies in a low-risk kidney transplant population: three or four days?

Authors:  Karen L Hardinger; Rafia S Rasu; Rebecca Skelton; Brent W Miller; Daniel C Brennan
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2010-11-07

7.  Perioperative Minimal Induction Therapy: A Further Step toward More Effective Immunosuppression in Transplantation.

Authors:  Alessia Gennarini; Paolo Cravedi; Maddalena Marasà; Annalisa Perna; Giovanni Rota; Mario Bontempelli; Silvio Sandrini; Giuseppe Remuzzi; Piero Ruggenenti
Journal:  J Transplant       Date:  2012-05-20

Review 8.  Biologics in renal transplantation.

Authors:  Ryszard Grenda
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 3.714

Review 9.  New directions for rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Thymoglobulin(®)) in solid organ transplants, stem cell transplants and autoimmunity.

Authors:  Mohamad Mohty; Andrea Bacigalupo; Faouzi Saliba; Andreas Zuckermann; Emmanuel Morelon; Yvon Lebranchu
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Risk factors for impaired CD4+ T-cell reconstitution following rabbit antithymocyte globulin treatment in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  Hélène Longuet; Bénédicte Sautenet; Philippe Gatault; Gilles Thibault; Christelle Barbet; Jean-Frédérique Marliere; Jean-Michel Halimi; Yvon Lebranchu; Christophe Baron; Matthias Büchler
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.782

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.