Literature DB >> 12023497

Assessing immunization rates in an ambulatory care setting.

Robin E Smith1, Alvin N Eden.   

Abstract

Members of the Collaborative Immunization Initiatives determined the immunization coverage rates for two groups of children in our clinic: those 7 to 12 months old and those 18 to 23 months old. The Clinic Assessment Software Application from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was used. The immunization rates determined by this method appeared to significantly underestimate the vaccination coverage rates in our clinic. A review of available charts included in the original sample was done excluding patients no longer attending our clinic. We found a higher rate of coverage in the same sample and a low rate of missed opportunities for administering immunizations. The major reason for this discrepancy is overly stringent Clinic Assessment Software Application inclusion criteria. Additional factors include failure to take into account the wide range of acceptable ages for administering immunizations and different dosages for different brands of vaccines. Different methods of calculation may cause as much as a 20% difference in immunization rates for the same or similar population groups. Such large differences may lead to vastly different responses and interventions. We believe that a central registry is the most accurate method of determining immunization rates. Until this is widely available and applied, a more accurate measure of a facility's immunization effectiveness is the number of missed opportunities for administering immunizations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12023497      PMCID: PMC3456804          DOI: 10.1093/jurban/79.2.219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urban Health        ISSN: 1099-3460            Impact factor:   3.671


  6 in total

Review 1.  Improving immunization coverage rates: an evidence-based review of the literature.

Authors:  A Shefer; P Briss; L Rodewald; R Bernier; R Strikas; H Yusuf; S Ndiaye; S Wiliams; M Pappaioanou; A R Hinman
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  Reasons for delayed compliance with the childhood vaccination schedule and some failings of computerised vaccination registers.

Authors:  A Richards; J Sheridan
Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.939

3.  National vaccination coverage levels among children aged 19-35 months--United States, 1998.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1999-09-24       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Measuring immunization coverage.

Authors:  G Fairbrother; G L Freed; J W Thompson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Estimating vaccination coverage using parental recall, vaccination cards, and medical records.

Authors:  P Bolton; E Holt; A Ross; N Hughart; B Guyer
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1998 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  National, state, and urban area vaccination coverage levels among children aged 19-35 months--United States, 1997.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1998-07-10       Impact factor: 17.586

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  Accuracy and usefulness of the HEDIS childhood immunization measures.

Authors:  David G Bundy; Barry S Solomon; Julia M Kim; Marlene R Miller
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 7.124

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.