Literature DB >> 12023058

Presence of visual head tracking differentiates normal sighted from retinal degenerate mice.

Caroline Thaung1, Karen Arnold, Ian J Jackson, Peter J Coffey.   

Abstract

We have generated a large number of potential eye and vision mutants by a mouse mutagenesis programme and sought to develop a rapid method for testing vision. This experiment assesses whether the visual tracking drum can differentiate between mice with and without retinal degeneration. The population of mice tested had a proportion with retinal degeneration, the remainder having normal retinas. Mice were observed in the visual tracking drum for a head tracking response to a visual stimulus. They were then examined for retinal degeneration. Of 204 animals tested, 138 had retinal degeneration. None of these showed any head tracking response. Of the remaining 66 with normal retinas, 45 showed a normal response, and 19 of the 21 mice which did not respond on a first test showed a normal response when the test was repeated. The visual tracking drum differentiates reliably between mice with normal vision and mice with severely decreased vision. There was a relatively high rate of non-responders among the normal sighted mice on a first test, but the test is rapid enough to be repeated easily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12023058     DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00223-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  35 in total

Review 1.  Cell replacement and visual restoration by retinal sheet transplants.

Authors:  Magdalene J Seiler; Robert B Aramant
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 21.198

2.  A system to measure the Optokinetic and Optomotor response in mice.

Authors:  Friedrich Kretschmer; Szilard Sajgo; Viola Kretschmer; Tudor C Badea
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 2.390

3.  Visual acuity in the short-tailed opossum (Monodelphis domestica).

Authors:  J C Dooley; H M Nguyen; A M H Seelke; L Krubitzer
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Variations of eye size parameters among different strains of mice.

Authors:  Oliver Puk; Claudia Dalke; Jack Favor; Martin Hrabé de Angelis; Jochen Graw
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Modulatory influence of stimulus parameters on optokinetic head-tracking response.

Authors:  Biju B Thomas; Dallas Shi; Kay Khine; Leo A Kim; Srinivas R Sadda
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Dendritic Cell Factor 1-Knockout Results in Visual Deficit Through the GABA System in Mouse Primary Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Jieyun Shi; Qian Li; Tieqiao Wen
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 5.203

Review 7.  Psychophysical testing in rodent models of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Stephanie L Grillo; Peter Koulen
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.467

8.  Mouse model resources for vision research.

Authors:  Jungyeon Won; Lan Ying Shi; Wanda Hicks; Jieping Wang; Ronald Hurd; Jürgen K Naggert; Bo Chang; Patsy M Nishina
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 1.909

9.  Behavioral evaluation of visual function of rats using a visual discrimination apparatus.

Authors:  Biju B Thomas; Deedar M Samant; Magdalene J Seiler; Robert B Aramant; Sharzad Sheikholeslami; Kevin Zhang; Zhenhai Chen; SriniVas R Sadda
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 2.390

10.  Early visual deficits in streptozotocin-induced diabetic long evans rats.

Authors:  Moe H Aung; Moon K Kim; Darin E Olson; Peter M Thule; Machelle T Pardue
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 4.799

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.