Literature DB >> 12022939

The cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance angiography for carotid artery stenosis and peripheral vascular disease: a systematic review.

E Berry1, S Kelly, M E Westwood, L M Davies, M J Gough, J M Bamford, J F M Meaney, C M Airey, J Cullingworth, M Barbieri, A Jackson, M A Smith.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2002        PMID： 12022939     DOI： 10.3310/hta6070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Technol Assess        ISSN： 1366-5278            Impact factor:   4.014


× No keyword cloud information.
  4 in total

Review 1.  Practical applications of cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  F Alpendurada; J Wong; D J Pennell
Journal:  Heart Asia       Date:  2009-01-01

2.  Contrast-enhanced MR angiography vs intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography for carotid imaging: activity-based cost analysis.

Authors:  Jean Marie U-King-Im; William Hollingworth; Rikin A Trivedi; Justin J Cross; Nicholas J Higgins; Martin J Graves; Peter J Kirkpatrick; Nagui M Antoun; Jonathan H Gillard
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A Factor Increasing Venous Contamination on Bolus Chase Three-dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Charcot Neuroarthropathy.

Authors:  Mehmet B Çildağ; Mustafa B Ertuğrul; Ömer Fk Köseoğlu; David G Armstrong
Journal:  J Clin Imaging Sci       Date:  2018-04-05

4.  Screen or not to screen for peripheral arterial disease: guidance from a decision model.

Authors:  Anil Vaidya; Manuela A Joore; Arina J Ten Cate-Hoek; Hugo Ten Cate; Johan L Severens
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.295
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.