Literature DB >> 12022749

Comparison of bacterial and tissue cell initial adhesion on hydrophilic/hydrophobic biomaterials.

Ayşe Gönen Karakeçili1, Menemşe Gümüşderelioglu.   

Abstract

In this study, interactions of widely-used polymeric biomaterials, i.e. poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (PHEMA) and its copolymer with dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate (PHEMA-20% DMAEMA), polyurethane (PU), polypropylene (PP), poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC), and poly(lactide-glycolide) (PLGA), with three pathogenic bacteria and one nonpathogen were investigated comparatively with the adhesion of two tissue cells in different morphologies, i.e. fibroblast-like baby hamster kidney (BHK 21) cells and epithelial Madine Darby kidney (MDBK) cells. Biomaterials were prepared in the membrane form by bulk polymerization or solvent casting. Surface characterization studies showed that these polymers have different surface free energies in the range of 26.9-63.1 erg cm(-2) and they have smooth surfaces. The bacteria used were; Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Staphylococcus epidermidis ATCC 12228, Staphylococcus aureus, and Lactobacillus acidophilus B-13. Initial adhesion of bacteria to the polymeric surfaces was examined under static conditions and in a laminar flow cell. The adhesion behaviour of S. aureus and S. epidermidis was found independent of the polymeric surface hydrophobicity. However, the percentage of attached E. coli decreased when increasing the surface free energy of the polymer, while L. acidophilus showed just the opposite behaviour. The comparative results indicated that the adhesion of BHK and MDBK cell was lowest on the most hydrophilic PHEMA surface and highest on the most hydrophobic PP surface. In contrast to the case of bacterial adhesion, no relationship was found between polymer hydrophobicity and mammalian cell adherence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12022749     DOI: 10.1163/156856202317414366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomater Sci Polym Ed        ISSN: 0920-5063            Impact factor:   3.517


  4 in total

1.  Functionalizing electrospun fibers with biologically relevant macromolecules.

Authors:  Cheryl L Casper; Nori Yamaguchi; Kristi L Kiick; John F Rabolt
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2005 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.988

2.  Subcritical CO2 sintering of microspheres of different polymeric materials to fabricate scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Manjari Bhamidipati; BanuPriya Sridharan; Aaron M Scurto; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 7.328

3.  Comparison of the adherence of E.Coli and S. Aureus to ten different prosthetic mesh grafts: In vitro experimental study.

Authors:  Bulent Gungor; Saban Esen; Ali Gök; Havva Yılmaz; Zafer Malazgirt; Hakan Leblebicioğlu
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Influence of nanophase titania topography on bacterial attachment and metabolism.

Authors:  Margaret R Park; Michelle K Banks; Bruce Applegate; Thomas J Webster
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2008
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.