Literature DB >> 12022670

Chemical and biological agent incident response and decision process for civilian and public sector facilities.

Ellen Raber1, Joy M Hirabayashi, Saverio P Mancieri, Alfred L Jin, Karen J Folks, Tina M Carlsen, Pete Estacio.   

Abstract

In the event of a terrorist attack or catastrophic release involving potential chemical and/or biological warfare agents, decisionmakers will need to make timely and informed choices about whether, or how, to respond. The objective of this article is to provide a decision framework to specify initial and follow-up actions, including possible decontamination, and to address long-term health and environmental issues. This decision framework consists of four phases, beginning with the identification of an incident and ending with verification that cleanup and remediation criteria have been met. The flowchart takes into account both differences and similarities among potential agents or toxins at key points in the decision-making process. Risk evaluation and communication of information to the public must be done throughout the process to ensure a successful effort.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12022670     DOI: 10.1111/0272-4332.00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  3 in total

1.  Predicting response to reassurances and uncertainties in bioterrorism communications for urban populations in New York and California.

Authors:  Elaine Vaughan; Tim L Tinker; Benedict I Truman; Paul Edelson; Stephen S Morse
Journal:  Biosecur Bioterror       Date:  2012-05-14

2.  Rapid-viability PCR method for detection of live, virulent Bacillus anthracis in environmental samples.

Authors:  Sonia E Létant; Gloria A Murphy; Teneile M Alfaro; Julie R Avila; Staci R Kane; Ellen Raber; Thomas M Bunt; Sanjiv R Shah
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Developing Health-Based Pre-Planning Clearance Goals for Airport Remediation Following Chemical Terrorist Attack: Introduction and Key Assessment Considerations.

Authors:  Annetta Watson; Linda Hall; Ellen Raber; Veronique D Hauschild; Fredrick Dolislager; Adam H Love; M Leslie Hanna
Journal:  Hum Ecol Risk Assess       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 5.190

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.