Literature DB >> 12022391

Comparison of static and dynamic medium environments for culturing of pre-implantation mouse embryos.

Debra L Hickman1, David J Beebe, Sandra L Rodriguez-Zas, Matthew B Wheeler.   

Abstract

The ability to manipulate mouse pre-implantation embryos in vitro has become a valuable tool in many scientific disciplines. However, fewer embryos maintain viability following in vitro manipulation compared with embryos in vivo. It has been suggested that use of dynamic medium environments may improve viability by simulating in utero environment. The objective of the study reported here was to compare a microdrop in vitro culture system with a microdevice in vitro culture system containing a static and two dynamic medium environments (0.1 and 0.5 microl/h) for culturing of mouse pre-implantation embryos. Results indicated that the static medium environment, in silicon-glass microdevices, was not significantly different from the microdrop control environment in proportion of embryos developing from the two-cell to the blastocyst stage. However, the static microdevice environment produced significantly (P < 0.05) more morulas than did that of the control group. Both of these treatment groups, under the presented conditions, consistently had significantly higher proportions of blastocysts (P < 0.05) and morulas (P < 0.05) and lower proportions of abnormal (P < 0.05) and eight-cell embryos (P < 0.05), compared with those of the high flow rate dynamic environment microdevice treatment groups. Studies exploring slower or pulsatile rates of medium delivery in a dynamic medium environment are indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12022391

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comp Med        ISSN: 1532-0820            Impact factor:   0.982


  11 in total

Review 1.  Rethinking in vitro embryo culture: new developments in culture platforms and potential to improve assisted reproductive technologies.

Authors:  Gary D Smith; Shuichi Takayama; Jason E Swain
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 4.285

2.  Controlled loading of cryoprotectants (CPAs) to oocyte with linear and complex CPA profiles on a microfluidic platform.

Authors:  Yun Seok Heo; Ho-Joon Lee; Bryan A Hassell; Daniel Irimia; Thomas L Toth; Heidi Elmoazzen; Mehmet Toner
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 6.799

Review 3.  Microfluidic Systems for Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Advantages and Potential Applications.

Authors:  Russel C Sequeira; Tracy Criswell; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.169

Review 4.  Microphysiologic systems in female reproductive biology.

Authors:  Alexandria N Young; Georgette Moyle-Heyrman; J Julie Kim; Joanna E Burdette
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2017-03-08

Review 5.  Application of microfluidic technologies to human assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Gary D Smith; Shuichi Takayama
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  Noninvasive metabolic profiling using microfluidics for analysis of single preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  John Paul Urbanski; Mark T Johnson; David D Craig; David L Potter; David K Gardner; Todd Thorsen
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Dynamic microfunnel culture enhances mouse embryo development and pregnancy rates.

Authors:  Y S Heo; L M Cabrera; C L Bormann; C T Shah; S Takayama; G D Smith
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-01-03       Impact factor: 6.918

8.  Digital Microfluidic Dynamic Culture of Mammalian Embryos on an Electrowetting on Dielectric (EWOD) Chip.

Authors:  Hong-Yuan Huang; Hsien-Hua Shen; Chang-Hung Tien; Chin-Jung Li; Shih-Kang Fan; Cheng-Hsien Liu; Wen-Syang Hsu; Da-Jeng Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Using a Dielectrophoretic Microfluidic Biochip Enhanced Fertilization of Mouse Embryo in Vitro.

Authors:  Hong-Yuan Huang; Wei-Lun Kao; Yi-Wen Wang; Da-Jeng Yao
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.891

10.  Comparison of static culture, micro-vibration culture, and micro-vibration culture with co-culture in poor ovarian responders.

Authors:  Yong Soo Hur; Eun Kyung Ryu; San Hyun Yoon; Kyung Sil Lim; Won Don Lee; Jin Ho Lim
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2016-09-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.