Literature DB >> 12022361

Measuring disability in ankylosing spondylitis: comparison of bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index with revised Leeds Disability Questionnaire.

Sophie Eyres1, Alan Tennant, Lesley Kay, Robin Waxman, Philip S Helliwell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Disability has been identified as a core outcome measure in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The Dougados Functional Index (DFI) and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) have been selected as core measures of function in this disease. However, neither of these instruments has undergone rigorous psychometric testing.
METHODS: The psychometric properties of 2 measures of disability, the BASFI and the revised Leeds Disability Questionnaire (RLDQ), were compared in a cohort of 208 outpatients with AS. Rasch analysis was used to examine the properties of each measure and to compare them on a common scale. Test-retest was assessed in a cohort of 149 subjects who completed each instrument twice over an interval of 2 weeks.
RESULTS: Both instruments gave an even spread of scores across the study group, but BASFI responses were positively skewed and RLDQ responses negatively skewed. There was a highly significant difference between perceived severity groups for both instruments (Kruskal-Wallis chi-squared: RLDQ, 75.1; BASFI, 80.4; both p < 0.0001). Both instruments gave acceptable test-retest scores (RLDQ ICC = 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97; BASFI ICC = 0.94, 95% CI 0.92-0.96). Both instruments were found to be unidimensional according to the Rasch model, but the BASFI had more items displaying differential item functioning. Category disordering was apparent with the BASFI but not the RLDQ. However, both instruments displayed disordered item thresholds. Neither instrument can be used as an interval measure. Both measures had "towers" of thresholds whereby several thresholds were marking the same point on the underlying disability construct. This was particularly notable in the case of the BASFI.
CONCLUSION: Both the BASFI and RLDQ provide a unidimensional measure of function in AS that is in accord with patient perception of disease severity. Neither instrument can be used as an interval measure. Changing the way that the instruments are scored, for example by collapsing categories, may improve their performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12022361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  3 in total

1.  ICF based comparison of disease specific instruments measuring physical functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis.

Authors:  T Sigl; A Cieza; D van der Heijde; G Stucki
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-04-20       Impact factor: 19.103

2.  Searching for optimal rating scales in the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI) and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI).

Authors:  Franco Franchignoni; Fausto Salaffi; Alessandro Ciapetti; Andrea Giordano
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Arabic Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (BASFI), the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Global score (BASG).

Authors:  Yasser El Miedany; Sally Youssef; Annie Mehanna; Naglaa Shebrya; Sherif Abu Gamra; Maha El Gaafary
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2008-01-05       Impact factor: 2.980

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.