OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the prevalence and clinical significance of proteinase 3 (PR3-) and myeloperoxidase (MPO-) antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in 115 patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc, scleroderma). METHODS: Sera were assayed by 2 independent centers, which used indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and direct ELISA as screening tests. Inhibition-ELISA for PR3- and MPO-ANCA and PR3 capture-ELISA experiments were also performed. The clinical features of the ANCA positive were compared with those of the ANCA negative scleroderma patients. RESULTS: The IIF test revealed 5 P-ANCA positive sera (4.34%). Surprisingly, by ELISA 2 of these were PR3-ANCA positive, one was MPO-ANCA positive, and 2 were both PR3- and MPO-ANCA positive. In addition, 3 IIF negative sera were ELISA positive, 2 for PR3- and one for MPO-ANCA. ELISA results were confirmed by fluid phase inhibition experiments. Only 2 out of the 6 PR3-direct ELISA positive sera were positive by PR3-capture ELISA at low titers. Neither PR3- nor MPO-ANCA were significantly associated to any clinical feature of patients with SSc. CONCLUSION: As well as the previously described MPO-ANCA, even PR3-ANCA may be detected in some sera from patients with SSc. The IIF pattern and the negative results obtained with PR3-capture ELISA suggest that different epitopes from those recognized by vasculitis sera might be involved with PR3-ANCA in SSc, and show the importance of combining IIF and ELISA tests for ANCA detection.
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the prevalence and clinical significance of proteinase 3 (PR3-) and myeloperoxidase (MPO-) antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in 115 patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc, scleroderma). METHODS: Sera were assayed by 2 independent centers, which used indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and direct ELISA as screening tests. Inhibition-ELISA for PR3- and MPO-ANCA and PR3 capture-ELISA experiments were also performed. The clinical features of the ANCA positive were compared with those of the ANCA negative sclerodermapatients. RESULTS: The IIF test revealed 5 P-ANCA positive sera (4.34%). Surprisingly, by ELISA 2 of these were PR3-ANCA positive, one was MPO-ANCA positive, and 2 were both PR3- and MPO-ANCA positive. In addition, 3 IIF negative sera were ELISA positive, 2 for PR3- and one for MPO-ANCA. ELISA results were confirmed by fluid phase inhibition experiments. Only 2 out of the 6 PR3-direct ELISA positive sera were positive by PR3-capture ELISA at low titers. Neither PR3- nor MPO-ANCA were significantly associated to any clinical feature of patients with SSc. CONCLUSION: As well as the previously described MPO-ANCA, even PR3-ANCA may be detected in some sera from patients with SSc. The IIF pattern and the negative results obtained with PR3-capture ELISA suggest that different epitopes from those recognized by vasculitis sera might be involved with PR3-ANCA in SSc, and show the importance of combining IIF and ELISA tests for ANCA detection.
Authors: Falin B Patel; Kara S Couch; Sean McNish; Jonathan D Miller; Robert Siegel; Samantha Easley; Victoria K Shanmugam Journal: Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 4.794