Literature DB >> 12021857

D2 or not D2? The gastrectomy question.

Wyn G Lewis1, Paul Edwards, Jonathan D Barry, Saboor Khan, Daljit Dhariwal, Ilias Hodzovic, Miles C Allison, Kenneth Shute.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The best reported long-term survival following surgery for gastric cancer is from centers performing radical D2 gastrectomy. Yet comparative studies from European centers report higher rates of postoperative complications following D2 gastrectomy than after the less radical D1 gastrectomy, without any benefit in survival. We aimed to compare the outcome after modified D2 gastrectomy (preserving spleen and pancreas where possible), performed by specialist surgeons, with that after conventional D1 gastrectomy performed by general surgeons for gastric cancer in a large United Kingdom cancer unit.
METHODS: Two groups of patients were studied: a historical control group of 245 consecutive patients with gastric cancer, of whom 50 underwent a potentially curative D1 resection (median age, 69 years; 35 males) was compared with 200 consecutive patients, 72 of whom underwent a potentially curative D2 resection (median age, 71 years; 47 males).
RESULTS: Among the 122 patients judged to have curable cancers, patients who underwent a D2 gastrectomy had lower operative mortality (8.3% vs 12%; chi(2) = 0.48; P = 0.50) and experienced fewer complications (28% vs 36%; chi(2) = 0.93; P = 0.35) than patients who underwent a D1 gastrectomy. Cumulative survival at 5 years was 56% after D2 resections, compared with 11% after D1 resections ( P < 0.00001). In a multivariate analysis, only the stage of disease (stage I, hazard ratio [HR], 0.068; P = 0.0001; stage II, HR, 0.165; P = 0.001; stage III, HR, 0.428; P = 0.053) and the level of lymphadenectomy (HR, 0.383; P = 0.00001) were independently associated with the duration of survival.
CONCLUSION: Modified D2 gastrectomy without pancreatico-splenectomy, performed by specialist surgeons, can improve survival after R0 resections without increasing operative morbidity and mortality, when compared with D1 gastrectomy performed by general surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12021857     DOI: 10.1007/s101200200004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastric Cancer        ISSN: 1436-3291            Impact factor:   7.370


  15 in total

1.  Risk factors related to operative morbidity in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  A Gil-Rendo; J L Hernández-Lizoain; F Martínez-Regueira; A Sierra Martínez; F Rotellar Sastre; M Cervera Delgado; V Valentí Azcarate; C Pastor Idoate; J Alvarez-Cienfuegos
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 2.  Systematic review of D2 lymphadenectomy versus D2 with para-aortic nodal dissection for advanced gastric cancer.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; Jun-Qiang Chen; Yun-Fei Cao
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Combined pretherapeutic endoscopic and laparoscopic ultrasonography may predict survival of patients with upper gastrointestinal tract cancer.

Authors:  Michael Bau Mortensen; Claus Fristrup; Alan Ainsworth; Henning Overgaard Nielsen; Torsten Pless; Claus Hovendal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Concepts, rationale, and current outcomes of less invasive surgical strategies for early gastric cancer: data from a quarter-century of experience in a single institution.

Authors:  Shouji Shimoyama; Yasuyuki Seto; Hidemitsu Yasuda; Ken-ichi Mafune; Michio Kaminishi
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Results of specialization in the surgical treatment of gastric cancer in Peru.

Authors:  Michel Portanova; Fernando Vargas; Emilio Lombardi; Victor Mena; Ramiro Carbajal; Nestor Palacios; Jorge Orrego
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Results of R0 surgery with D2 lymphadenectomy for the treatment of localised gastric cancer.

Authors:  A Díaz de Liaño; C Yárnoz; C Artieda; R Aguilar; S Viana; A Artajona; H Ortiz
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.405

7.  Physiological performance and inflammatory markers as indicators of complications after oesophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  A G M T Powell; C Eley; T Abdelrahman; A H Coxon; C Chin; I Appadurai; R Davies; D M Bailey; W G Lewis
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2020-08-04

8.  Workload and resource implications of upper gastrointestinal cancer surgical centralisation in South East Wales.

Authors:  M A Morgan; M Goodson; X Escofet; G W B Clark; W G Lewis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Prognostic significance of gastrin expression in patients undergoing R0 gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Michael R Stephens; Andrew N Hopper; Wyn G Lewis; Guy Blackshaw; Paul Edwards; Becky Osborne; Ian W Thompson
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  Rationale for gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Alvaro Díaz de Liaño; Concepción Yarnoz; Rubén Aguilar; Cristina Artieda; Héctor Ortiz
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 7.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.