Literature DB >> 12021478

Objective standard setting (or truth in advertising).

G E Stone1.   

Abstract

Over the past 40 years criterion referencing has become the major method for setting passing standards on most high-stakes examinations. This paper serves three purposes. First it reveals the limitations and methodological weaknesses of most popular standard setting models, supported by a large volume of prior investigation. Second, it presents a radically different approach to the question of setting standards. The new model called Objective Standard Setting was developed in the early 1990s and has been successfully practiced in a variety of settings since that time. While presented in educational forums for many years, this paper represents the first published account of its methods. Thirdly,suggestions for new considerations of validity in standard setting are addressed. There port concludes with the suggestion that however well-intentioned popular standard setting efforts may be, psychometric experts must more carefully and fully understand the models behind their practices and the validity, meaning and implications of their thought processes.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12021478

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Meas        ISSN: 1529-7713


  4 in total

1.  An instrument to objectively measure pharmacist professionalism as an outcome: a pilot study.

Authors:  Michael J Peeters; Gregory E Stone
Journal:  Can J Hosp Pharm       Date:  2009-05

2.  A standardized rubric to evaluate student presentations.

Authors:  Michael J Peeters; Eric G Sahloff; Gregory E Stone
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Testing a Motivational Interviewing Implementation Intervention in Adolescent HIV Clinics: Protocol for a Type 3, Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Trial.

Authors:  Sylvie Naar; Karen MacDonell; Jason E Chapman; Lisa Todd; Sitaji Gurung; Demetria Cain; Rafael E Dilones; Jeffrey T Parsons
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-06-07

4.  Using item response theory to explore the psychometric properties of extended matching questions examination in undergraduate medical education.

Authors:  Bipin Bhakta; Alan Tennant; Mike Horton; Gemma Lawton; David Andrich
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2005-03-07       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.