Literature DB >> 12021432

Towards a general model for protein-substrate stereoselectivity.

Vidyasankar Sundaresan1, Ravinder Abrol.   

Abstract

Protein-substrate interactions in enzymatic, neurological, and immunological systems are typically characterized by a high degree of stereoselectivity towards complex substrates. We propose a novel stereocenter-recognition (SR) model for stereoselectivity of proteins (or receptors in general) towards substrates that have multiple stereocenters, based on the topology of substrate stereocenters. The model provides the minimum number of substrate locations that need to enter into binding, nonbinding, or repulsive interactions with receptor sites, for stereoselectivity to occur. According to this model, a substrate location may interact with multiple receptor sites, or multiple substrate locations may interact with a single receptor site, but a stereoselective receptor has to offer, in the correct geometry, at least as many interactions as the required minimum number of substrate locations. The SR model predicts that stereoselectivity towards an acyclic substrate with N stereocenters distributed along a single chain requires interactions involving a minimum of N + 2 substrate locations, distributed over all stereocenters in the substrate, such that effectively three locations exist per stereocenter. Thus, enantioselective recognition of molecules with one chiral center requires a protein to interact with a minimum of three substrate locations, while stereoselectivity towards substrates with two or three stereocenters requires interactions with a minimum of four or five substrate locations, respectively, and so on. We demonstrate the general applicability of this model to protein-substrate interactions by interpreting several previous experimental observations.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12021432      PMCID: PMC2373627          DOI: 10.1110/ps.3280102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  12 in total

1.  A new model for protein stereospecificity.

Authors:  A D Mesecar; D E Koshland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-02-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Application of a Theory of Enzyme Specificity to Protein Synthesis.

Authors:  D E Koshland
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1958-02       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Studies on the relationship between chemical constitution and physiological action: Molecular dissymmetry and physiological activity.

Authors:  L H Easson; E Stedman
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1933       Impact factor: 3.857

4.  Interpretation of experiments on metabolic processes, using isotopic tracer elements.

Authors:  A G OGSTON
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1948-12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Identification by mutagenesis of arginines in the substrate binding site of the porcine NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  S Soundar; B L Danek; R F Colman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-02-25       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  Sites of binding and orientation in a four-location model for protein stereospecificity.

Authors:  A D Mesecar; D E Koshland
Journal:  IUBMB Life       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.885

7.  Three-point attachment: past, present, but no future.

Authors:  R Bentley
Journal:  Trans N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1983

8.  Expression and mutagenesis of mammalian cytosolic NADP+-specific isocitrate dehydrogenase.

Authors:  G T Jennings; K I Minard; L McAlister-Henn
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1997-11-04       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  The agonistic binding site at the histamine H2 receptor. II. Theoretical investigations of histamine binding to receptor models of the seven alpha-helical transmembrane domain.

Authors:  P H Nederkoorn; E M van Gelder; G M Donné-Op den Kelder; H Timmerman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.686

10.  Chiral recognition in gas-phase cyclodextrin: amino acid complexes--is the three point interaction still valid in the gas phase?

Authors:  S Ahn; J Ramirez; G Grigorean; C B Lebrilla
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.262

View more
  6 in total

1.  Mechanisms of selectivity in channels and enzymes studied with interactive molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Paul Grayson; Emad Tajkhorshid; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Structural basis for the enantiospecificities of R- and S-specific phenoxypropionate/alpha-ketoglutarate dioxygenases.

Authors:  Tina A Müller; Maria I Zavodszky; Michael Feig; Leslie A Kuhn; Robert P Hausinger
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Mechanism of amido-thiourea catalyzed enantioselective imine hydrocyanation: transition state stabilization via multiple non-covalent interactions.

Authors:  Stephan J Zuend; Eric N Jacobsen
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 15.419

4.  Mechanism of inhibition of the GluA2 AMPA receptor channel opening by talampanel and its enantiomer: the stereochemistry of the 4-methyl group on the diazepine ring of 2,3-benzodiazepine derivatives.

Authors:  Congzhou Wang; Li Niu
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 4.418

5.  Computational structural analysis of an anti-L-amino acid antibody and inversion of its stereoselectivity.

Authors:  Daniel I Ranieri; Heike Hofstetter; Oliver Hofstetter
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.645

6.  Exploring enantiospecific ligand-protein interactions using cellular membrane affinity chromatography: chiral recognition as a dynamic process.

Authors:  Krzysztof Jozwiak; Ruin Moaddel; Sarangan Ravichandran; Anita Plazinska; Joanna Kozak; Sharvil Patel; Rika Yamaguchi; Irving W Wainer
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 3.205

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.