Literature DB >> 12020361

Can larvae of the pod-borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), select between wild and cultivated pigeonpea Cajanus sp. (Fabaceae)?

P C Stevenson1, P W C Green, P C Stevenson1, M S J Simmonds, H C Sharma.   

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to observe the feeding and food selection-behaviour of different instars of the pod-borer Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) in response to choices between the cultivated and a wild species of Cajanus. First and second instars fed upon a cultivated variety of Cajanus cajan in preference to a wild species, C. scarabaeoides and on flowers of C. cajan, rather than pods or leaves of C. cajan. First and second instars preferred pods of C. scarabaeoides with trichomes removed to pods with trichomes present. All instars fed upon pods of C. cajan rather than those of C. scarabaeoides. Solvent extraction of the pod surfaces affected the feeding of larvae, in some instances. They preferred the unextracted pods of C. cajan; the extracted pod of C. scarabaeoides (first and second instars) or the unextracted pod of C. scarabaeoides (fourth and fifth instars). Glass-fibre disc bioassays showed that the methanol, hexane and water extracts from the pod-surface of C. cajan stimulated the feeding of fifth instars. The experiments have shown that characteristics of C. cajan, such as either the compounds present or the type and distribution of trichomes on the plant surfaces, can determine the susceptibility of C. cajan to pod-borer larvae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12020361     DOI: 10.1079/BER2001143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Entomol Res        ISSN: 0007-4853            Impact factor:   1.750


  7 in total

1.  Nutritional performance and activity of some digestive enzymes of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera, in response to seven tested bean cultivars.

Authors:  Foroogh Rahimi Namin; Bahram Naseri; Jabraeil Razmjou
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.857

2.  Screening for antifeedant and larvicidal activity of plant extracts against Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner), Sylepta derogata (F.) and Anopheles stephensi (Liston).

Authors:  C Kamaraj; A Abdul Rahuman; A Bagavan
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Phenolic compounds on the pod-surface of pigeonpea, Cajanus cajan, mediate feeding behavior of Helicoverpa armigera larvae.

Authors:  Paul W C Green; Philip C Stevenson; Monique S J Simmonds; Hari C Sharma
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Pigeonpea genotypes influence parasitization preference and survival and development of the Helicoverpa armigera larval parasitoid, Campoletis chlorideae.

Authors:  Shiddalingappa V Hugar; Hari C Sharma; Kondikallu Basavan Goud
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-07-28

5.  Resistance of Soybean Genotypes to Anticarsia gemmatalis (Lepidoptera: Erebidae): Antixenosis and Antibiosis Characterization.

Authors:  S Ongaratto; C M Silveira; M C Santos; J E R Gorri; M M P Sartori; Thomas E Hunt; A L Lourenção; E L L Baldin
Journal:  J Econ Entomol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Reaping the Potential of Wild Cajanus Species through Pre-Breeding for Improving Resistance to Pod Borer, Helicoverpa armigera, in Cultivated Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.).

Authors:  Shivali Sharma; Jagdish Jaba; Polneni Jaganmohan Rao; Suraj Prasad; Nammi Tripura Venkata Venu Gopal; Hari Chand Sharma; Benjamin Kilian
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-22

7.  Effect of different host plants on nutritional indices of the pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera.

Authors:  S A Hemati; B Naseri; G Nouri Ganbalani; H Rafiee Dastjerdi; A Golizadeh
Journal:  J Insect Sci       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.857

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.