Literature DB >> 12019711

Cellular dermal matrix used for root coverage: 18-month follow-up observation.

Randall J Harris1.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the long-term stability of the root coverage results obtained with an acellular dermal matrix. The mean root coverage at 12 weeks postoperative was 91.7%. The mean root coverage at the final postoperative evaluation (mean 18.6 months) was 87.0%. This difference was not statistically or clinically significant. The root coverage results obtained with an acellular dermal matrix were predictable, esthetic, and stable over time.

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2002        PMID： 12019711

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent        ISSN： 0198-7569            Impact factor:   1.840


  10 in total

1.  A novel soft tissue cone-beam computed tomography study in the evaluation of gingival thickness associated with subepithelial connective tissue graft versus acellular dermal matrix in the management of gingival recession: A clinical study.

Authors:  Nimisha Mithradas; Uma Sudhakar; Lalitha T Arunachalam; Snophia Suresh; Manoj Raja
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2020-09-01

2.  A comparative clinical evaluation of acellular dermal matrix allograft and sub-epithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions.

Authors:  Somnath B Koudale; Pretti A Charde; Manohar L Bhongade
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-07

3.  Clinical evaluation of alloderm for root coverage and colour match.

Authors:  M Shanmugam; V Sivakumar; V Anitha; B Sivakumar
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2012-04

4.  A comparative 6-month clinical study of acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue graft for root coverage.

Authors:  S Sadat Mansouri; N Ayoubian; M Eslami Manouchehri
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2010-09-30

5.  A comparative clinical study of the efficacy of subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft in root coverage: 6-month follow-up observation.

Authors:  Libby John Thomas; Pamela Emmadi; Ramakrishnan Thyagarajan; Ambalavanan Namasivayam
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2013-07

6.  Management of gingival recession with acellular dermal matrix graft: A clinical study.

Authors:  V R Balaji; T Ramakrishnan; D Manikandan; R Lambodharan; B Karthikeyan; Thanvir Mohammed Niazi; G Ulaganathan
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2016-10

7.  Histomorphometric Comparison between Two Types of Acellular Dermal Matrix Grafts: A Mini Pig Animal Model Study.

Authors:  Javier Aragoneses; Ana Suárez; Cinthia Rodríguez; Juan Manuel Aragoneses
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Regenerative Potential of Enamel Matrix Protein Derivative and Acellular Dermal Matrix for Gingival Recession: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Muhammad Saad Shaikh; Mohid Abrar Lone; Hesham Matabdin; Muneeb Ahmed Lone; Azeem Hussain Soomro; Muhammad Sohail Zafar
Journal:  Proteomes       Date:  2021-02-25

9.  Long-term predictability of allogenic dermal matrix for root coverage: Three years observation period on 15 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Khalid Al-Hamdan
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2020-01-16

10.  Comparison of acellular dermal matrix allograft (ADMA) and a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) for the treatment of gingival recession.

Authors:  Niloofar Jenabian; Mohadese Yazdanpanahbahabadi; Parya Haghpanah Aski; Ali Bijani
Journal:  J Adv Periodontol Implant Dent       Date:  2020-04-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.