Literature DB >> 12019598

The SF-36 general health status survey documents the burden of osteoarthritis and the benefits of total joint arthroplasty: but why should we use it?

Gary M Kiebzak1, Meredith Campbell, David R Mauerhan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To document the disease burden of osteoarthritis and the benefits of total joint replacement by using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) general health status survey and evaluate other factors that could affect scores. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients scheduled for primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (n = 622 preoperatively) in 2 years were surveyed using the SF-36, which assesses health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients' physical and social functioning and mental health. Follow-up surveys were administered 12 months after surgery to all patients and 3 and 24 months after surgery to a subset of patients.
RESULTS: Preoperatively, patient scores were significantly lower than normative scores in the physical functioning, bodily pain, and social functioning domains. Preoperative scores were not different between THA and TKA patients. Women scored lower than men. Comorbid conditions were weakly associated with low SF-36 scores. Postoperatively, the largest incremental improvement in scores was seen at 3-month follow-up. Scores improved sooner and more substantially in THA vs TKA patients and in men vs women, paralleling improvement in clinical and subjective ratings of postoperative physical function and pain.
CONCLUSIONS: The SF-36 has the sensitivity to document improvement in HRQOL after surgery and to reveal differences in THA vs TKA and in men vs women. However, routine use of outcome assessment instruments to monitor this patient population is costly and unjustified in our current healthcare environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12019598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  24 in total

1.  No difference between tibia-first and femur-first techniques in TKA using computer-assisted surgery.

Authors:  Roland Becker; Markus Malzdorf; Christian Stärke; Pirtkien Randolf; Christoph Lohmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-25       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Clinical outcome and quality of life after computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty: results from a prospective, single-surgeon study and review of the literature.

Authors:  Christian-Dominik Peterlein; Markus Dietmar Schofer; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Friedrich Georg Scherf
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-10-30

Review 3.  The impact of non-traumatic hip and knee disorders on health-related quality of life as measured with the SF-36 or SF-12. A systematic review.

Authors:  Johanna M van der Waal; Caroline B Terwee; Daniëlle A W M van der Windt; Lex M Bouter; Joost Dekker
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Evaluation and prediction of health-related quality of life for total hip replacement among Chinese in Taiwan.

Authors:  Hon-Yi Shi; Herng-Chia Chiu; Je-Ken Chang; Jun-Wen Wang; Richard Culbertson; M Mahmud Khan
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  A pragmatic observational feasibility study on integrated treatment for musculoskeletal disorders: Design and protocol.

Authors:  Xiao-yang Hu; John Hughes; Peter Fisher; Ava Lorenc; Rachel Purtell; A-La Park; Nicola Robinson
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 1.978

6.  Importance of patient satisfaction with care in predicting osteoarthritis-specific health-related quality of life one year after total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Cédric Baumann; Anne-Christine Rat; Didier Mainard; Christian Cuny; Francis Guillemin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Social support and health-related quality of life in hip and knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  O Ethgen; P Vanparijs; S Delhalle; S Rosant; O Bruyère; J Y Reginster
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Patient relevant outcome 7 years after total hip replacement for OA - a prospective study.

Authors:  Anna-K Nilsdotter; Fredrik Isaksson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Clinical and functional results after the rehabilitation period in minimally-invasive unicondylar knee arthroplasty patients.

Authors:  Susanne Fuchs; Bernd Rolauffs; Thorsten Plaumann; Carsten O Tibesku; Dieter Rosenbaum
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2004-06-02       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Satisfaction with care after total hip or knee replacement predicts self-perceived health status after surgery.

Authors:  Cédric Baumann; Anne Christine Rat; Georges Osnowycz; Didier Mainard; Christian Cuny; Francis Guillemin
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.