Literature DB >> 12018339

Rehabilitation factors contributing to implant benefit in children.

Ann Geers1, Chris Brenner, Johanna Nicholas, Rosalie Uchanski, Nancy Tye-Murray, Emily Tobey.   

Abstract

This study was performed to investigate factors contributing to auditory, speech, language, and reading outcomes after 4 to 6 years of multichannel cochlear implant use in children with prelingual deafness. The analysis controlled for the effects of child, family, and implant characteristics so that the educational factors most conducive to maximum implant benefit could be identified. We tested 136 children from across the United States and Canada. All were 8 or 9 years of age, had an onset of deafness before 3 years of age, underwent implantation by 5 years of age, and resided in a monolingual English-speaking home environment. Characteristics of the child and the family (primarily nonverbal IQ) accounted for approximately 20% of the variance in outcome after implantation. An additional 24% was accounted for by implant characteristics and 12% by educational variables, particularly communication mode. Oral education appears to be an important educational choice for children who have undergone cochlear implantation before 5 years of age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12018339     DOI: 10.1177/00034894021110s525

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl        ISSN: 0096-8056


  9 in total

1.  The effect of age at cochlear implant initial stimulation on expressive language growth in infants and toddlers.

Authors:  J Bruce Tomblin; Brittan A Barker; Linda J Spencer; Xuyang Zhang; Bruce J Gantz
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Voice gender and the segregation of competing talkers: Perceptual learning in cochlear implant simulations.

Authors:  Jessica R Sullivan; Peter F Assmann; Shaikat Hossain; Erin C Schafer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Aminoglycoside Increases Permeability of Osseous Spiral Laminae of Cochlea by Interrupting MMP-2 and MMP-9 Balance.

Authors:  Dengke Li; Jianhe Sun; Lidong Zhao; Weiwei Guo; Wei Sun; Shiming Yang
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.911

4.  Communication, psychosocial, and educational outcomes of children with cochlear implants and challenges remaining for professionals and parents.

Authors:  Renée Punch; Merv B Hyde
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-05

5.  A retrospective study of cochlear implant outcomes in children with residual hearing.

Authors:  Elizabeth Fitzpatrick; Rosemary McCrae; David Schramm
Journal:  BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord       Date:  2006-04-19

6.  A Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Examining Factors Influencing Outcomes with Cochlear Implant in Mandarin-Speaking Children.

Authors:  Yuan Chen; Lena L N Wong; Shufeng Zhu; Xin Xi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force Guidelines for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Children.

Authors:  Andrea D Warner-Czyz; J Thomas Roland; Denise Thomas; Kristin Uhler; Lindsay Zombek
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

8.  Cochlear implants and ex vivo BDNF gene therapy protect spiral ganglion neurons.

Authors:  Darius Rejali; Valerie A Lee; Karen A Abrashkin; Nousheen Humayun; Donald L Swiderski; Yehoash Raphael
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  A Ten-Year Review of Audiological Performance in Children with Inner Ear Abnormalities after Cochlear Implantation in Singapore.

Authors:  Sok Yan Tay; Rosslyn Anicete; Kun Kiaang Henry Tan
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-12-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.