Literature DB >> 12018294

Comparison of the fermentability of enzymatic hydrolyzates of sugarcane bagasse pretreated by steam explosion using different impregnating agents.

Carlos Martín1, Mats Galbe, Nils-Olof Nilvebrant, Leif J Jönsson.   

Abstract

Sugarcane bagasse is a potential lignocellulosic feedstock for ethanol production, since it is cheap, readily available, and has a high carbohydrate content. In this work, bagasse was subjected to steam explosion pretreatment with different impregnation conditions. Three parallel pretreatments were carried out, one without any impregnation, a second with sulfur dioxide, and a third with sulfuric acid as the impregnating agent. The pretreatments were performed at 205 degrees C for 10 min. The pretreated material was then hydrolyzed using cellulolytic enzymes. The chemical composition of the hydrolyzates was analyzed. The highest yields of xylose (16.2 g/100 g dry bagasse), arabinose (1.5 g/100 g), and total sugar (52.9 g/100 g) were obtained in the hydrolysis of the SO2 -impregnated bagasse. The H2SO4 -impregnated bagasse gave the highest glucose yield (35.9 g/100 g) but the lowest total sugar yield (42.3 g/100 g) among the three methods. The low total sugar yield from the H2SO4-impregnated bagasse was largely due to by-product formation, as the dehydration of xylose to furfural. Sulfuric acid impregnation led to a three-fold increase in the concentration of the fermentation inhibitors furfural and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) and a two-fold increase in the concentration of inhibitory aliphatic acids (formic, acetic, and levulinic acids) compared to the other two pretreatment methods. The total content of phenolic compounds was not strongly affected by the different pretreatment methods, but the quantities of separate phenolic compounds were widely different in the hydrolyzate from the H2SO4-impregnated bagasse compared with the other two hydrolyzates. No major differences in the content of inhibitors were observed in the hydrolyzates obtained from SO2-impregnated and non-impregnated bagasse. The fermentability of all three hydrolyzates was tested with a xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with and without nutrient supplementation. The hydrolyzates of SO2-impregnated and nonimpregnated bagasse showed similar fermentability, whereas the hydrolyzate of H2SO4-impregnated bagasse fermented considerably poorer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12018294     DOI: 10.1385/abab:98-100:1-9:699

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol        ISSN: 0273-2289            Impact factor:   2.926


  14 in total

1.  Inhibitory action of toxic compounds present in lignocellulosic hydrolysates on xylose to xylitol bioconversion by Candida guilliermondii.

Authors:  Rogério S Pereira; Solange I Mussatto; Inês C Roberto
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-09-05       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Efficient chemical and enzymatic saccharification of the lignocellulosic residue from Agave tequilana bagasse to produce ethanol by Pichia caribbica.

Authors:  Jaime Saucedo-Luna; Agustin Jaime Castro-Montoya; Mauro Manuel Martinez-Pacheco; Carlos Ruben Sosa-Aguirre; Jesus Campos-Garcia
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Effect of lignocellulose-derived inhibitors on growth of and ethanol production by growth-arrested Corynebacterium glutamicum R.

Authors:  Shinsuke Sakai; Yoshiki Tsuchida; Hiroka Nakamoto; Shohei Okino; Osamu Ichihashi; Hideo Kawaguchi; Takashi Watanabe; Masayuki Inui; Hideaki Yukawa
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-02       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Pretreatment and enzymatic process modification strategies to improve efficiency of sugar production from sugarcane bagasse.

Authors:  Siddhartha Pal; Shereena Joy; Kalpana D Trimukhe; Pramod S Kumbhar; Anjani J Varma; Sasisanker Padmanabhan
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 2.406

5.  Multi-product biorefineries from lignocelluloses: a pathway to revitalisation of the sugar industry?

Authors:  Somayeh Farzad; Mohsen Ali Mandegari; Miao Guo; Kathleen F Haigh; Nilay Shah; Johann F Görgens
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  Bioconversion of lignocellulose: inhibitors and detoxification.

Authors:  Leif J Jönsson; Björn Alriksson; Nils-Olof Nilvebrant
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Identification of benzoquinones in pretreated lignocellulosic feedstocks and inhibitory effects on yeast.

Authors:  Stefan Stagge; Adnan Cavka; Leif J Jönsson
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.298

8.  Exploring grape marc as trove for new thermotolerant and inhibitor-tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for second-generation bioethanol production.

Authors:  Lorenzo Favaro; Marina Basaglia; Alberto Trento; Eugéne Van Rensburg; Maria García-Aparicio; Willem H Van Zyl; Sergio Casella
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 6.040

9.  Effects of aromatic compounds on the production of bacterial nanocellulose by Gluconacetobacter xylinus.

Authors:  Shuo Zhang; Sandra Winestrand; Xiang Guo; Lin Chen; Feng Hong; Leif J Jönsson
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 5.328

10.  Ethanol production potential from AFEX™ and steam-exploded sugarcane residues for sugarcane biorefineries.

Authors:  Thapelo Mokomele; Leonardo da Costa Sousa; Venkatesh Balan; Eugéne van Rensburg; Bruce E Dale; Johann F Görgens
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-05-04       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.