Literature DB >> 12018020

Assessment of cancer risk and environmental levels of arsenic in New Hampshire.

Margaret R Karagas1, Therese A Stukel, Tor D Tosteson.   

Abstract

The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) and the United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response (OSWER) list arsenic as a major concern for Superfund sites and the environment at large. Arsenic is clearly linked to skin, bladder, and lung cancer occurrence in populations highly exposed to arsenic occupationally, medicinally, or through contaminated drinking water (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1999; IARC, 1987). While these studies have identified important adverse health effects, they cannot provide risk information at lower levels of exposure such as those commonly found in the US. Additionally, precise measurement of exposure is critical to assessing risk in populations consuming relatively trace amounts of arsenic. In New Hampshire, domestic wells serve roughly 40% of the population, and about 10% of these contain arsenic concentrations in the controversial range of 10 to 50 micrograms/l. New Hampshire, along with other states in New England, has among the highest bladder cancer mortality rates in the country. Therefore, we are conducting a population-based epidemiologic study in New Hampshire (1) to assess the risk of skin and bladder cancer associated with arsenic exposure in a US population, (2) to evaluate methods of quantifying individual exposure to arsenic at low to moderate levels, and (3) to explore alternative models of determining the dose-response relationship at the lower end of exposure. Our findings to date indicate that toenail arsenic concentrations are a reliable, long-term biomarker of total arsenic exposure and reflect arsenic intake by drinking water containing 1 microgram/l or more. We found that urinary arsenic cannot be detected consistently in a population for which drinking water arsenic is primarily below 50 micrograms/l. Lastly, our data suggest that use of a biologic marker along with alternative statistical approaches may aid detection of the levels at which arsenic may affect cancer occurrence in the US.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12018020     DOI: 10.1078/1438-4639-00133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  40 in total

1.  A case-control study of polymorphisms in xenobiotic and arsenic metabolism genes and arsenic-related bladder cancer in New Hampshire.

Authors:  Corina Lesseur; Diane Gilbert-Diamond; Angeline S Andrew; Rebecca M Ekstrom; Zhongze Li; Karl T Kelsey; Carmen J Marsit; Margaret R Karagas
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 4.372

2.  Micronucleus frequency in peripheral blood lymphocytes and buccal mucosa cells of copper smelter workers, with special regard to arsenic exposure.

Authors:  D Lewińska; J Palus; M Stepnik; E Dziubałtowska; J Beck; K Rydzyński; A T Natarajan; R Nilsson
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Arsenic disruption of steroid receptor gene activation: Complex dose-response effects are shared by several steroid receptors.

Authors:  Jack E Bodwell; Julie A Gosse; Athena P Nomikos; Joshua W Hamilton
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.739

4.  SLC39A2 and FSIP1 polymorphisms as potential modifiers of arsenic-related bladder cancer.

Authors:  Margaret R Karagas; Angeline S Andrew; Heather H Nelson; Zhongze Li; Tracy Punshon; Alan Schned; Carmen J Marsit; J Steven Morris; Jason H Moore; Anna L Tyler; Diane Gilbert-Diamond; Mary-Lou Guerinot; Karl T Kelsey
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Flow and sorption controls of groundwater arsenic in individual boreholes from bedrock aquifers in central Maine, USA.

Authors:  Qiang Yang; Charles W Culbertson; Martha G Nielsen; Charles W Schalk; Carole D Johnson; Robert G Marvinney; Martin Stute; Yan Zheng
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 7.963

Review 6.  Basal cell carcinomas: attack of the hedgehog.

Authors:  Ervin H Epstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Arsenic abrogates the estrogen-signaling pathway in the rat uterus.

Authors:  Aniruddha Chatterjee; Urmi Chatterji
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 5.211

8.  From the Cover: Arsenite Uncouples Mitochondrial Respiration and Induces a Warburg-like Effect in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Anthony L Luz; Tewodros R Godebo; Dhaval P Bhatt; Olga R Ilkayeva; Laura L Maurer; Matthew D Hirschey; Joel N Meyer
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2016-05-20       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Chronic exposure to arsenic in the drinking water alters the expression of immune response genes in mouse lung.

Authors:  Courtney D Kozul; Thomas H Hampton; Jennifer C Davey; Julie A Gosse; Athena P Nomikos; Phillip L Eisenhauer; Daniel J Weiss; Jessica E Thorpe; Michael A Ihnat; Joshua W Hamilton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  Lung cancer in a U.S. population with low to moderate arsenic exposure.

Authors:  Julia E Heck; Angeline S Andrew; Tracy Onega; James R Rigas; Brian P Jackson; Margaret R Karagas; Eric J Duell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.