OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent and characteristics of discharge delays of younger patients from acute hospital beds in Oxford, England. DESIGN: Three-month prospective analysis of patients deemed to have delayed discharge. MEASURES: The primary measure was the number of days from the patient being no longer in need of acute medical inpatient care to eventual discharge. Additional assessments included demographic data, primary diagnosis, Motricity Index, Short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test (SOMC), Barthel Index and contextual data. SETTING: The major acute hospitals serving the county of Oxfordshire (560,000 people). SUBJECTS: Fifty patients aged 18-70 years identified by referrals, delayed discharge lists and ward visits whose discharge from hospital had been delayed. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation, SD) delay period was 36.1 (26.8) days. The mean prevalence and incidence of discharge delays for each three-day period was 19.7 (SD 1.7) and one (SD 1.7) respectively. Most (88%, n = 44) had a primary neurological diagnosis. Twenty-four (48%) patients had Motricity Index scores of less than 50% in one or more limbs and 16 (32%) in two or more limbs. Twenty-six (52%) patients had cognitive impairment (SOMC <18/28). Thirty-nine (78%) patients had a Barthel Index score of less than 15/20 and 24 (48%) of less than 10/20. The period of discharge delay did not correlate with SOMC, Motricity or Barthel Index scores. Only nine had appropriate accommodation available. CONCLUSION: Patients whose discharge is delayed were common; most had a neurological disability and cognitive impairment; and accommodation was unsuitable or absent for most. Reorganizing services to give patients access to specialized disability services might both improve the care of these patients and increase the efficiency of the health service.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent and characteristics of discharge delays of younger patients from acute hospital beds in Oxford, England. DESIGN: Three-month prospective analysis of patients deemed to have delayed discharge. MEASURES: The primary measure was the number of days from the patient being no longer in need of acute medical inpatient care to eventual discharge. Additional assessments included demographic data, primary diagnosis, Motricity Index, Short Orientation-Memory-Concentration Test (SOMC), Barthel Index and contextual data. SETTING: The major acute hospitals serving the county of Oxfordshire (560,000 people). SUBJECTS: Fifty patients aged 18-70 years identified by referrals, delayed discharge lists and ward visits whose discharge from hospital had been delayed. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation, SD) delay period was 36.1 (26.8) days. The mean prevalence and incidence of discharge delays for each three-day period was 19.7 (SD 1.7) and one (SD 1.7) respectively. Most (88%, n = 44) had a primary neurological diagnosis. Twenty-four (48%) patients had Motricity Index scores of less than 50% in one or more limbs and 16 (32%) in two or more limbs. Twenty-six (52%) patients had cognitive impairment (SOMC <18/28). Thirty-nine (78%) patients had a Barthel Index score of less than 15/20 and 24 (48%) of less than 10/20. The period of discharge delay did not correlate with SOMC, Motricity or Barthel Index scores. Only nine had appropriate accommodation available. CONCLUSION:Patients whose discharge is delayed were common; most had a neurological disability and cognitive impairment; and accommodation was unsuitable or absent for most. Reorganizing services to give patients access to specialized disability services might both improve the care of these patients and increase the efficiency of the health service.
Authors: Anthony D Bai; Cathy Dai; Siddhartha Srivastava; Christopher A Smith; Sudeep S Gill Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2019-12-04 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Krishantha H Jasinarachchi; Ibrahim R Ibrahim; Breffni C Keegan; Rajaratnam Mathialagan; John C McGourty; James R N Phillips; Phyo K Myint Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2009-01-22 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Christina L Hammond; Margaret F Phillips; Lorraine L Pinnington; Benedict J Pearson; Apostolos Fakis Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-02-27 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Antonio Rojas-García; Simon Turner; Elena Pizzo; Emma Hudson; James Thomas; Rosalind Raine Journal: Health Expect Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 3.377