AIMS: To use data generated from an integrated care pathway (ICP) to describe the characteristics of patients presenting with depression in a brain injury rehabilitation programme and to assess their response to treatment with sertraline. SETTING: A regional rehabilitation unit providing inpatient rehabilitation for young patients (16-65) with severe complex disabilities. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of 82 patients admitted to the unit during the 15-month period between between 1 September 1999 and 1 December 2000. Response to sertraline was assessed in an open-label, before-and-after study design. METHODS AND DESIGN: All admissions were screened and included in the ICP if there was clinical suspicion of depression, past or present. Antidepressant medication was prescribed, where appropriate, according to the ICP protocol. Depression was diagnosed on clinical grounds against DSM-IV criteria, and measured where feasible using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) administered by interview, pretreatment and at 6-8 weeks. RESULTS: Of 82 admissions 41 (50%) were managed using the ICP and 27 (64%) were either started on or changed to sertraline--21 for depression +/- lability and six for emotional lability only. All of the depressed patients improved clinically at some level and no significant side-effects were observed. The BDI-II was assessable in 17/21 who showed a mean improvement of 14.5 +/- 9.7 (confidence interval (CI) 9.3-19.7, p < 0.001). Eleven patients (52%) had previously failed to respond with a different selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) agent but still made a significant response when changed to sertraline with a mean reduction in BDI-II of 16.3 +/- 10.9 (CI 8.4-24.11, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The ICP was practical to use and provided systematic data on assessment of depression and response to treatment in 'real-life' clinical practice in a brain injury rehabilitation setting. Sertraline appears to be useful and well-tolerated in this context. A full placebo-controlled study is now required.
AIMS: To use data generated from an integrated care pathway (ICP) to describe the characteristics of patients presenting with depression in a brain injury rehabilitation programme and to assess their response to treatment with sertraline. SETTING: A regional rehabilitation unit providing inpatient rehabilitation for young patients (16-65) with severe complex disabilities. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of 82 patients admitted to the unit during the 15-month period between between 1 September 1999 and 1 December 2000. Response to sertraline was assessed in an open-label, before-and-after study design. METHODS AND DESIGN: All admissions were screened and included in the ICP if there was clinical suspicion of depression, past or present. Antidepressant medication was prescribed, where appropriate, according to the ICP protocol. Depression was diagnosed on clinical grounds against DSM-IV criteria, and measured where feasible using the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) administered by interview, pretreatment and at 6-8 weeks. RESULTS: Of 82 admissions 41 (50%) were managed using the ICP and 27 (64%) were either started on or changed to sertraline--21 for depression +/- lability and six for emotional lability only. All of the depressedpatients improved clinically at some level and no significant side-effects were observed. The BDI-II was assessable in 17/21 who showed a mean improvement of 14.5 +/- 9.7 (confidence interval (CI) 9.3-19.7, p < 0.001). Eleven patients (52%) had previously failed to respond with a different selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor (SSRI) agent but still made a significant response when changed to sertraline with a mean reduction in BDI-II of 16.3 +/- 10.9 (CI 8.4-24.11, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The ICP was practical to use and provided systematic data on assessment of depression and response to treatment in 'real-life' clinical practice in a brain injury rehabilitation setting. Sertraline appears to be useful and well-tolerated in this context. A full placebo-controlled study is now required.
Authors: Charles H Bombardier; Jesse R Fann; Nancy R Temkin; Peter C Esselman; Jason Barber; Sureyya S Dikmen Journal: JAMA Date: 2010-05-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jesse R Fann; Charles H Bombardier; Nancy Temkin; Peter Esselman; Catherine Warms; Jason Barber; Sureyya Dikmen Journal: J Head Trauma Rehabil Date: 2017 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 2.710
Authors: Jennifer S Albrecht; Zippora Kiptanui; Yuen Tsang; Bilal Khokhar; Gordon S Smith; Ilene H Zuckerman; Linda Simoni-Wastila Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2015-03-25 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Krista L Lanctôt; Mark J Rapoport; Florance Chan; Ryan D Rajaram; John Strauss; Tricia Sicard; Scott McCullagh; Anthony Feinstein; Alex Kiss; James L Kennedy; Anne S Bassett; Nathan Herrmann Journal: Brain Inj Date: 2010 Impact factor: 2.311