Literature DB >> 12017412

A new approach to multicultural item generation in the development of two obesity-specific measures: the Obesity and Weight Loss Quality of Life (OWLQOL) questionnaire and the Weight-Related Symptom Measure (WRSM).

Mauro Niero1, Mona Martin, Thomas Finger, Ramona Lucas, Isabelle Mear, Diane Wild, Laura Glauda, Donald L Patrick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Being overweight or obese has substantial effects on individuals' perceptions of their health and quality of life (QoL). Generic measures often miss important QoL information, and existing obesity-specific instruments have shortcomings with respect to cross-cultural input, application to differing levels of severity, conceptual clarity, and patient burden.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop culturally sensitive measures of QoL and symptoms in overweight or obese persons, both those trying to lose weight and those not trying to lose weight.
METHODS: Currently accepted criteria and guidelines for questionnaire development were streamlined and augmented to include cross-cultural input from 5 European countries and the United States. The preliminary pool of items was created based on qualitative interviews conducted in the United States, followed by an early check of item translatability and preharmonization across all languages. Ten additional qualitative in-country interviews were then conducted to produce further culture-specific items. This was followed by 2 forward and 1 backward translation, plus cognitive debriefing interviews in each country. Finally, an expanded international harmonization meeting was held to ensure inclusion of appropriate new items and their acceptability across all 6 cultures.
RESULTS: The procedures described resulted in development of the 41-item Obesity and Weight Loss Quality of Life questionnaire and the 20-item Weight-Related Symptom Measure. These questionnaires are subject to further psychometric validation.
CONCLUSIONS: Augmentation of the initial item-generation and international harmonization steps of questionnaire development through integration of cross-cultural input allowed greater validity of cross-cultural content while meeting time, budget, and resource constraints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12017412     DOI: 10.1016/s0149-2918(02)85144-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  25 in total

1.  Dietary and physical activity behaviours related to obesity-specific quality of life and work productivity: baseline results from a worksite trial.

Authors:  Stephanie Whisnant Cash; Shirley A A Beresford; Jo Ann Henderson; Anne McTiernan; Liren Xiao; C Y Wang; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 3.718

2.  Validation of the Spanish translation of the questionnaire for the obesity-related problems scale.

Authors:  Amaia Bilbao; Javier Mar; Blanca Mar; Arantzazu Arrospide; Gabriel Martínez de Aragón; José María Quintana
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Quality of life and bariatric surgery: a systematic review of short- and long-term results and comparison with community norms.

Authors:  L C H Raaijmakers; S Pouwels; S E M Thomassen; S W Nienhuijs
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Cross-cultural validity of the structured clinical interview for panic-agoraphobic spectrum.

Authors:  Ellen Frank; M Katherine Shear; Paola Rucci; Susanna Banti; Mauro Mauri; Jack D Maser; David J Kupfer; Mario Miniati; Andrea Fagiolini; Giovanni B Cassano
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 5.  Analysis of health-related quality-of-life instruments measuring the impact of bariatric surgery: systematic review of the instruments used and their content validity.

Authors:  Raed Tayyem; Abdulmajid Ali; John Atkinson; Colin R Martin
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 6.  Obesity in the Context of Aging: Quality of Life Considerations.

Authors:  Francesco Corica; Giampaolo Bianchi; Andrea Corsonello; Natalia Mazzella; Fabrizia Lattanzio; Giulio Marchesini
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Assessment tools in obesity - psychological measures, diet, activity, and body composition.

Authors:  Laura Beechy; Jennie Galpern; Andrew Petrone; Sai Krupa Das
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-04-24

Review 8.  Quality of Life Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Aleeya Hachem; Leah Brennan
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Development and validation of the Treatment Related Impact Measure of Weight (TRIM-Weight).

Authors:  Meryl Brod; Mette Hammer; Nana Kragh; Suzanne Lessard; Donald M Bushnell
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Increases in physical activity may affect quality of life differently in men and women: the PACE project.

Authors:  Stephanie Whisnant Cash; Glen E Duncan; Shirley A A Beresford; Anne McTiernan; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 4.147

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.