Literature DB >> 12016599

Percutaneous electrode guidance: a noninvasive technique for prelocation of peripheral nerves to facilitate peripheral plexus or nerve block.

William F Urmey1, Paolo Grossi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Typically, peripheral nerve block is done by approximating nerve location, usually by use of anatomical landmarks. Precise nerve location has been done by needle exploration. A new method, percutaneous electrode guidance (PEG) of the block needle, was performed. A transcutaneous stimulating cylindrical electrode was used to indent the skin, locate the underlying nerve, and guide a block needle near it.
METHODS: PEG was used to prelocate the desired nerve or neural plexus by use of a shielded cylindrical electrode with a 1-mm-diameter conductive area of skin contact at the distal end, the center of which contained a 22-gauge (1/2 mm) hole, which precisely matched a shielded conventional block needle. Transcutaneous stimulation began at less than 10 mA and was decreased to minimal amperage that elicited the desired motor response. Electrode position was fixed, and electrode current was discontinued. A shielded 22-gauge block needle was advanced through the electrode guide to near the underlying nerve. Initial needle current was only 0.5 mA. Local anesthetic was injected to block the targeted nerve or nerves. Standard sensory/motor testing was performed at 20 minutes.
RESULTS: Nine upper or lower extremity blocks were performed on 7 patients. All were successful. Minimal stimulating currents were 1.3 to 8.2 mA for transcutaneous electrode stimulation and 0.20 to 0.70 for needle stimulation. Needle depth was 0.4 to 1.1 cm beyond the electrode tip and correlated with minimal electrode stimulating current.
CONCLUSIONS: A smooth, metal-tipped electrically shielded skin electrode probe can be used to comfortably and accurately indent the skin over a desired nerve or plexus, define its anatomical course, and subsequently guide a block needle near it.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12016599     DOI: 10.1053/rapm.2002.31211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med        ISSN: 1098-7339            Impact factor:   6.288


  5 in total

1.  [Brachial plexus. Anesthesia and analgesia].

Authors:  S Schulz-Stübner
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2003-06-18       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [Localization of peripheral nerves. Success and safety with electrical nerve stimulation].

Authors:  M Neuburger; U Schwemmer; T Volk; W Gogarten; P Kessler; T Steinfeldt
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Anesthesiological considerations in shoulder surgery.

Authors:  M Lanna; A Pastore; C Policastro; C Iacovazzo
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2012-04-30

4.  Mechanistically informed non-invasive peripheral nerve stimulation for peripheral neuropathic pain: a randomised double-blind sham-controlled trial.

Authors:  Selina Johnson; Anne Marshall; Walter Magerl; Andreas Goebel; Dyfrig Hughes; Emily Holmes; Florian Henrich; Turo Nurmikko; Manohar Sharma; Bernhard Frank; Paul Bassett; Andrew Marshall
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2021-11-06       Impact factor: 5.531

5.  The importance of needle echogenity in ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block: a randomized controlled clinical study.

Authors:  Cevdet Duger; Ahmet Cemil Isbir; Kenan Kaygusuz; Iclal Ozdemir Kol; Sinan Gursoy; Hayati Ozturk; Caner Mimaroğlu
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.