Literature DB >> 12015249

Risks associated with spinal manipulation.

Clare Stevinson1, Edzard Ernst.   

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the evidence about the risks of spinal manipulation. Articles were located through searching three electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library), contacting experts (n =9), scanning reference lists of relevant articles, and searching departmental files. Reports in any language containing data relating to risks associated with spinal manipulation were included, irrespective of the profession of the therapist. Where available, systematic reviews were used as the basis of this article. All papers were evaluated independently by the authors. Data from prospective studies suggest that minor, transient adverse events occur in approximately half of all patients receiving spinal manipulation. The most common serious adverse events are vertebrobasilar accidents, disk herniation, and cauda equina syndrome. Estimates of the incidence of serious complications range from 1 per 2 million manipulations to 1 per 400,000. Given the popularity of spinal manipulation, its safety requires rigorous investigation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12015249     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01068-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  18 in total

1.  United Kingdom back pain exercise and manipulation (UK BEAM) trial: touch may have had non-specific effect, among other things.

Authors:  Edzard Ernst
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-19

2.  The complexity of complementary medicine: chiropractic for back pain.

Authors:  E Ernst
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 3.  Herniated lumbar disc.

Authors:  Jo Jordan; Kika Konstantinou; John O'Dowd
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2011-06-28

4.  A finite element study of traditional Chinese cervical manipulation.

Authors:  Zhen Deng; Kuan Wang; Huihao Wang; Tianying Lan; Hongsheng Zhan; Wenxin Niu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Risk of traumatic injury associated with chiropractic spinal manipulation in Medicare Part B beneficiaries aged 66 to 99 years.

Authors:  James M Whedon; Todd A Mackenzie; Reed B Phillips; Jon D Lurie
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Chiropractic clinical practice guideline: evidence-based treatment of adult neck pain not due to whiplash.

Authors:  Elizabeth Anderson-Peacock; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Roland Bryans; Normand Danis; Andrea Furlan; Henri Marcoux; Brock Potter; Rick Ruegg; Janice Gross Stein; Eleanor White
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2005-09

Review 7.  Adverse effects of spinal manipulation: a systematic review.

Authors:  E Ernst
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Clinical effectiveness of manual therapy for the management of musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal conditions: systematic review and update of UK evidence report.

Authors:  Christine Clar; Alexander Tsertsvadze; Rachel Court; Gillian Lewando Hundt; Aileen Clarke; Paul Sutcliffe
Journal:  Chiropr Man Therap       Date:  2014-03-28

Review 9.  A systematic review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulation.

Authors:  E Ernst; P H Canter
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 18.000

10.  Overcoming barriers to the use of osteopathic manipulation techniques in the emergency department.

Authors:  Raymond J Roberge; Marc R Roberge
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.