Literature DB >> 12014930

A nurse led peripherally inserted central catheter line insertion service is effective with radiological support.

Jonathan M Barber1, Doris M Booth, Julia A King, Sam Chakraverty.   

Abstract

AIM: Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) are increasingly used as a route of chemotherapy administration. Our aims were to assess a collaborative approach to PICC placement, with radiological support for a nurse led line insertion service in a minority of cases, and to determine whether PICC provided a safe and reliable method of chemotherapy administration.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective data on 100 consecutive patients undergoing PICC placement for chemotherapy were collected. Lines were inserted by ward based nurses or under ultrasound guidance by radiologists. End points were successful completion of treatment or patient death.
RESULTS: One hundred and forty-four lines were placed for 118 courses of chemotherapy. 107 (74%) were placed by nurses and 37 (26%) by radiologists. Ninety-five percent of patients completed therapy with either one or two lines. Seventy percent of lines were removed on achieving the primary end points. In two additional patients PICC could not be placed radiologically. Twelve patients were unable to complete treatment with PICC alone, nine of these required an alternative administration route. The catheter related sepsis rate was 4.9%.
CONCLUSION: The majority of PICC can be successfully placed by trained nurses, reserving image guidance only for more difficult cases. PICC have an acceptable complication profile, and decrease the need for tunnelled central lines. Copyright 2002 The Royal College of Radiologists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12014930     DOI: 10.1053/crad.2001.0843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  5 in total

1.  Peripherally inserted central catheters are equivalent to centrally inserted catheters in intensive care unit patients for central venous pressure monitoring.

Authors:  Heath E Latham; Scott T Rawson; Timothy T Dwyer; Chirag C Patel; Jo A Wick; Steven Q Simpson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Internal mammary artery injury following subclavian vein catheterization.

Authors:  Yukihiro Hama; Tatsumi Kaji; Manabu Fujii; Shigeru Kosuda
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2005-04

3.  An in vitro study comparing a peripherally inserted central catheter to a conventional central venous catheter: no difference in static and dynamic pressure transmission.

Authors:  Heath E Latham; Timothy T Dwyer; Bethene L Gregg; Steven Q Simpson
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Outcomes associated with peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalised children: a retrospective 7-year single-centre experience.

Authors:  Aditya Badheka; Jodi Bloxham; April Schmitz; Barbara Freyenberger; Tong Wang; Sankeerth Rampa; Jennifer Turi; Veerasathpurush Allareddy; Marcelo Auslender; Veerajalandhar Allareddy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Risk factors for peripherally inserted central catheter line-related deep venous thrombosis in critically ill intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  M Bhargava; S Broccard; Y Bai; B Wu; E H Dincer; A Broccard
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2020-06-04
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.