Chrys Jaye1, Murray Tilyard. 1. Department of General Practice, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, New Zealand. cjaye@gp.otago.ac.nz
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In New Zealand there is increasing interest in the variation in the prescribing behaviours of general practitioners (GPs). Research conducted to date hasfocused primarily on the quantifiable aspects of prescribing variation. AIM: To investigate the qualitative aspects that may help explain variations in prescribing behaviour between GPs. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative and comparative interviews. SETTING: Thirty New Zealand GPs. METHOD: A sample of 60 GPs (comprising 20 low, 20 medium, and 20 high-cost prescribers) was selected. Half of this sample (10 GPs in each prescribing category) was recruited to the study. Responders participated in a 60-minute interview. RESULTS: Low-cost prescribers reported more experience in practice and appeared to have a more 'relaxed' attitude towards medicine. They were more comfortable with refusing patients and they responded to patient expectations with education and explanation. In addition, they viewed the prescription as a pragmatic means of delivering health care to patients. Low and medium-cost prescribers did moreformal counselling and emphasised the 'listening' aspects of general practice. High-cost prescribers appeared to be more highly motivated and to have a more 'serious' attitude toward medicine. They tended to view their obligations and responsibilities to the patient in terms of medical competence. They described their roles with patients in terms of service provision and suggested that patients viewed the prescription as a signifier of the GP's service to the patient. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that there are discernible, non-quantifiable differences between low, medium, and high-cost prescribers in the Otago and Southland areas of New Zealand.
BACKGROUND: In New Zealand there is increasing interest in the variation in the prescribing behaviours of general practitioners (GPs). Research conducted to date hasfocused primarily on the quantifiable aspects of prescribing variation. AIM: To investigate the qualitative aspects that may help explain variations in prescribing behaviour between GPs. DESIGN OF STUDY: Qualitative and comparative interviews. SETTING: Thirty New Zealand GPs. METHOD: A sample of 60 GPs (comprising 20 low, 20 medium, and 20 high-cost prescribers) was selected. Half of this sample (10 GPs in each prescribing category) was recruited to the study. Responders participated in a 60-minute interview. RESULTS: Low-cost prescribers reported more experience in practice and appeared to have a more 'relaxed' attitude towards medicine. They were more comfortable with refusing patients and they responded to patient expectations with education and explanation. In addition, they viewed the prescription as a pragmatic means of delivering health care to patients. Low and medium-cost prescribers did moreformal counselling and emphasised the 'listening' aspects of general practice. High-cost prescribers appeared to be more highly motivated and to have a more 'serious' attitude toward medicine. They tended to view their obligations and responsibilities to the patient in terms of medical competence. They described their roles with patients in terms of service provision and suggested that patients viewed the prescription as a signifier of the GP's service to the patient. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that there are discernible, non-quantifiable differences between low, medium, and high-cost prescribers in the Otago and Southland areas of New Zealand.
Authors: H Ohlsson; U Lindblad; T Lithman; B Ericsson; U-G Gerdtham; A Melander; L Råstam; J Merlo Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2005-10-19 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Johannes H J M Uijen; Huug J van Duijn; Marijke M Kuyvenhoven; François G Schellevis; Johannes C van der Wouden Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2008-04 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Sara Macdonald; Jill Morrison; Margaret Maxwell; Rosalia Munoz-Arroyo; Andrew Power; Michael Smith; Matt Sutton; Philip Wilson Journal: Br J Gen Pract Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 5.386
Authors: Judith D de Jong; Peter P Groenewegen; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Gert P Westert; Dinny H de Bakker Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2009-01-30 Impact factor: 2.655