Literature DB >> 12014229

Concordance between rating of perceived exertion and function in persons with chronic, disabling back pain.

Agnes S Wallbom1, Michael E Geisser, Andrew J Haig, Karen Yamakawa, Derrick Montgomery.   

Abstract

Rating of perceived exertion (RPE), or the Borg scale, has been shown to be positively associated with physiologic effort in individuals undergoing cardiovascular assessment. This study examined the correlations between cardiovascular performance, psychosocial factors, and the RPE scale among 50 persons with chronic pain undergoing multidisciplinary assessment. The results indicated a significant negative association between fitness outcome measures (maximum VO2 and endurance on bicycle), psychosocial measures, and age. With a mean maximum heart rate achieved on the exercise bicycle of 79.2% (SD = 8.3), there was no significant association between the highest rating of perceived exertion on the exercise bicycle test and percent of maximum heart rate. Percent of maximum heart rate was significantly related to self-reported pain and disability as well as age. These findings suggest that perceived exertion in this population is not highly correlated with physiologic effort, as other factors such as pain may influence effort ratings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12014229     DOI: 10.1023/a:1015060530414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  7 in total

1.  Perceived exertion: a note on "history" and methods.

Authors:  G A Borg
Journal:  Med Sci Sports       Date:  1973

2.  Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Rehabil Med       Date:  1970

3.  The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: conceptualization and development.

Authors:  J A Kopec; J M Esdaile; M Abrahamowicz; L Abenhaim; S Wood-Dauphinee; D L Lamping; J I Williams
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  The McGill Pain Questionnaire: major properties and scoring methods.

Authors:  Ronald Melzack
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Deconditioning in patients with chronic low back pain: fact or fiction?

Authors:  H Wittink; T Hoskins Michel; A Wagner; A Sukiennik; W Rogers
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Effect of alcohol on perceived exertion in relation to heart rate and blood lactate.

Authors:  G Borg; M Domserius; L Kaijser
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1990

7.  Detecting depression in chronic pain patients: adequacy of self-reports.

Authors:  D C Turk; A Okifuji
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  1994-01
  7 in total
  4 in total

Review 1.  Psychosocial factors and functional capacity evaluation among persons with chronic pain.

Authors:  Michael E Geisser; Michael E Robinson; Quaintance L Miller; Suzanne M Bade
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-12

2.  Energetics and mechanics of walking in patients with chronic low back pain and healthy matched controls.

Authors:  Yves Henchoz; Nicola Soldini; Nicolas Peyrot; Davide Malatesta
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  The impact of aerobic fitness on functioning in chronic back pain.

Authors:  Marjon E A Wormgoor; Aage Indahl; Maurits W van Tulder; Han C G Kemper
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Are functional capacity evaluations affected by the patient's pain?

Authors:  Douglas P Gross
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2006-04
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.