Literature DB >> 12013519

Telephone interviewing: is it compatible with interpretive phenomenological research?

Linda Sweet1.   

Abstract

The telephone has long been used as a medium of communication. In more recent years the telephone has become a legitimate tool in marketing and survey research (Barriball et al. 1996). Telephone interviewing is becoming an increasingly popular form of interview for qualitative research (Carr & Worth 2001). Whilst there have been discussions in the literature on logistical advantages and disadvantages of telephone interviewing, there has been little debate as to whether this form of interview is compatible with qualitative health research. Much of the literature reporting this interview method is based on quantitative or structured questionnaire style research under the guise of 'qualitative' research. So the question remains: Is the telephone interview compatible with interpretive phenomenological research? This paper describes how telephone interviewing was used in a recently conducted interpretive phenomenological study, and argues that this is a methodologically and economically valuable data collection technique in qualitative research. Qualitative researchers should not rely exclusively on the face-to-face interview, as the telephone interview can be an equally valuable data collection approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12013519     DOI: 10.5172/conu.12.1.58

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Nurse        ISSN: 1037-6178            Impact factor:   1.787


  18 in total

Review 1.  Is there a bias against telephone interviews in qualitative research?

Authors:  Gina Novick
Journal:  Res Nurs Health       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.228

2.  Conducting qualitative interviews by telephone: Lessons learned from a study of alcohol use among sexual minority and heterosexual women.

Authors:  Laurie Drabble; Karen F Trocki; Brenda Salcedo; Patricia C Walker; Rachael A Korcha
Journal:  Qual Soc Work       Date:  2016-05-14

3.  Financial considerations in the conduct of multi-centre randomised controlled trials: evidence from a qualitative study.

Authors:  Claire Snowdon; Diana R Elbourne; Jo Garcia; Marion K Campbell; Vikki A Entwistle; David Francis; Adrian M Grant; Rosemary C Knight; Alison M McDonald; Ian Roberts
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Supportive care needs of women with breast cancer in rural Scotland.

Authors:  Gill Hubbard; Christine Venning; Alison Walker; Karen Scanlon; Richard G Kyle
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  What is the Experience of Receiving Health Care for Neck Pain?

Authors:  Joy C Macdermid; David M Walton; Jordan Miller
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2013-09-20

6.  Qualitative process evaluation of a problem-solving guided self-help manual for family carers of young people with first-episode psychosis.

Authors:  Terence V McCann; Dan I Lubman
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 3.630

7.  Dealing with the death of a long term patient; what is the impact and how do podiatrists cope?

Authors:  Kristy Robson; Cylie M Williams
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Postpartum Women's Perspectives of Engaging with a Dietitian and Exercise Physiologist via Video Consultations for Weight Management: A Qualitative Evaluation.

Authors:  Lisa Vincze; Megan E Rollo; Melinda J Hutchesson; Robin Callister; Debbe I Thompson; Clare E Collins
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2018-01-19

9.  Faculty perceptions of simulation programs in healthcare education.

Authors:  Ana P Quilici; Angélica M Bicudo; Renan Gianotto-Oliveira; Sergio Timerman; Francisco Gutierrez; Karen C Abrão
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2015-11-22

10.  A qualitative evaluation of occupational therapy-led work rehabilitation for people with inflammatory arthritis: Patients' views.

Authors:  Yeliz Prior; Aparna Evangelina Amanna; Sarah Jane Bodell; Alison Hammond
Journal:  Br J Occup Ther       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 1.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.