Literature DB >> 12012363

Changes in biological anthropology: results of the 1998 American Association of Physical Anthropology Membership Survey.

Trudy R Turner1.   

Abstract

In response to the results of the 1996 survey of the membership of the American Association of Physical Anthropology (AAPA), the Executive Committee of the Association sponsored a follow-up survey designed to assess gender and specialty differences in training, employment, academic status, mentoring, and research support. A total of 993 questionnaires was analyzed, representing approximately 62% of the 1998 membership of the Association. There has been a marked shift in the number of males and females in the discipline from the 1960s to the 1990s. While 51.2% of all respondents are female and 48.8% are male, 70% of the students are female. Chi-square tests indicate significant differences between males and females by highest degree, age, status, obtaining a tenure-track position, receiving tenure, and taking nontenure-track employment before receiving a tenure-track position. In recent years, there has been an increasing number of females in the ranks of assistant and associate professors; however, this is not true for the rank of professor. There are also significant differences between males and females by specialty within the discipline: researchers in primatology, human biological variation, skeletal biology, and paleopathology are primarily female, while researchers in human and primate evolution are increasingly female. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12012363     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  3 in total

Review 1.  Ethics in biological anthropology.

Authors:  Trudy R Turner; Jennifer K Wagner; Graciela S Cabana
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Is Primatology an equal-opportunity discipline?

Authors:  Elsa Addessi; Marta Borgi; Elisabetta Palagi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Stag parties linger: continued gender bias in a female-rich scientific discipline.

Authors:  Lynne A Isbell; Truman P Young; Alexander H Harcourt
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.