Literature DB >> 12012288

Diagnosis of intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of ultrasound parameters.

William J Ott1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is an attempt to evaluate the best ultrasonic method of diagnosing intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR); a retrospective study of patients with singleton pregnancies who had been scanned at the author's institution within 2 weeks of their delivery was undertaken. Estimated fetal weight, abdominal circumference, head circumference/abdominal circumference ratio, abdominal circumference/femur length ratio, and umbilical artery S/D ratio were compared for accuracy in prediction IUGR in the neonate using both univariant and multivariant statistical analysis. Five hundred one (501) patients were analyzed. One hundred fourteen (114) neonates were classified as IUGR (22.8%). Doppler evaluation of the umbilical artery showed the best sensitivity while both abdominal circumference alone and estimated fetal weight showed similar specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and lowest false-positive and -negative results. Logistic regression analysis confirmed the univariant results and showed that, when used in combination, abdominal circumference and Doppler, or estimated fetal weight and Doppler resulted in the best predictive values. Either estimated fetal weight or abdominal circumference (alone) are accurate predictors of IUGR. Combined with Doppler studies of the umbilical artery either method will provide accurate evaluation of suspected IUGR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12012288     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-25313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  6 in total

1.  Obstetric management of IUGR.

Authors:  Mariapia Militello; Elisa Maria Pappalardo; Santina Ermito; Angela Dinatale; Alessandro Cavaliere; Sabina Carrara
Journal:  J Prenat Med       Date:  2009-01

Review 2.  Management of fetal growth restriction.

Authors:  M Alberry; P Soothill
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  A modified prenatal growth assessment score for the evaluation of fetal growth in the third trimester using single and composite biometric parameters.

Authors:  Russell L Deter; Wesley Lee; Haleh Sangi-Haghpeykar; Adi L Tarca; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2014-07-11

Review 4.  Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Mario Merialdi; Lawrence D Platt; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Malaria and fetal growth alterations in the 3(rd) trimester of pregnancy: a longitudinal ultrasound study.

Authors:  Christentze Schmiegelow; Daniel Minja; Mayke Oesterholt; Caroline Pehrson; Hannah Elena Suhrs; Stéphanie Boström; Martha Lemnge; Pamela Magistrado; Vibeke Rasch; Birgitte Bruun Nielsen; John Lusingu; Thor G Theander
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Significance of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies in normally grown fetuses.

Authors:  Nebras Abu Al Hamayel; Haitham Baghlaf; Karin Blakemore; Jude P Crino; Irina Burd
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2020-02-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.