Literature DB >> 12012096

Seeing more than meets the eye: processing of illusory contours in animals.

A Nieder1.   

Abstract

This review article illustrates that mammals, birds and insects are able to perceive illusory contours. Illusory contours lack a physical counterpart, but monkeys, cats, owls and bees perceive them as if they were real borders. In all of these species, a neural correlate for such perceptual completion phenomena has been described. The robustness of neuronal responses and the abundance of cells argue that such neurons might indeed represent a neural correlate for illusory contour perception. The internal state of an animal subject (i.e., alert and behaving) seems to be an important factor when correlating neural activity with perceptual phenomena. The fact that the neural network necessary for illusory contour perception has been found in relatively early visual brain areas in all tested animals suggests that bottom-up processing is largely sufficient to explain such perceptual abilities. However, recent findings in monkeys indicate that feedback loops within the visual system may provide additional modulation. The detection of illusory contours by independently evolved visual systems argues that processing of edges in the absence of contrast gradients reflects fundamental visual constraints and not just an artifact of visual processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12012096     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-002-0306-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  34 in total

1.  Comparison of length judgments and the Müller-Lyer illusion in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Oana Tudusciuc; Andreas Nieder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Setting boundaries: brain dynamics of modal and amodal illusory shape completion in humans.

Authors:  Micah M Murray; Deirdre M Foxe; Daniel C Javitt; John J Foxe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Visual interpolation for contour completion by the European cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) and its use in dynamic camouflage.

Authors:  Sarah Zylinski; Anne-Sophie Darmaillacq; Nadav Shashar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Global visual processing in macaques studied using Kanizsa illusory shapes.

Authors:  Kimberly A Feltner; Lynne Kiorpes
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.241

5.  Response characteristics of the pigeon's pretectal neurons to illusory contours and motion.

Authors:  Yu-Qiong Niu; Qian Xiao; Rui-Feng Liu; Le-Qing Wu; Shu-Rong Wang
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Equivalent representation of real and illusory contours in macaque V4.

Authors:  Yanxia Pan; Minggui Chen; Jiapeng Yin; Xu An; Xian Zhang; Yiliang Lu; Hongliang Gong; Wu Li; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Receptive field focus of visual area V4 neurons determines responses to illusory surfaces.

Authors:  Michele A Cox; Michael C Schmid; Andrew J Peters; Richard C Saunders; David A Leopold; Alexander Maier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  From optics to attention: visual perception in barn owls.

Authors:  Wolf M Harmening; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Rhesus monkeys behave as if they perceive the Duncker Illusion.

Authors:  A Z Zivotofsky; M E Goldberg; K D Powell
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Automatic feature-based grouping during multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Brian P Keane; Everett Mettler; Todd S Horowitz; Philip J Kellman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.