Literature DB >> 12012080

Effects of altitude on the energetics of human best performances in 100 m running: a theoretical analysis.

Laurent M Arsac1.   

Abstract

The present study was designed to investigate the role of reduced air density on the energetics of 100 m running at altitude. A mathematical supply-demand model was used where supply had two components, aerobic and anaerobic and demand had three components: the cost of overcoming non-aerodynamic forces (C(na)), the cost of overcoming air resistance (C(aero)), and the cost due to changes in the runner's kinetic energy (C(kin)). Actual instantaneous-speed curves recorded in 100 m world champions were modelled at sea level. Then I calculated improvements in 100 m running times and changes in the components of the energy cost with changes in altitude from 0 m to 4,000 m. For the 100 m world championship for men, the model predicted times of 9.88 s at sea level, 9.80 s at 1,000 m, 9.73 s at 2,000 m, 9.64 s at 4,000 m and 9.15 s in the hypothetical situation where the air resistance was nil. In the counterpart for women the corresponding times were 10.85 s, 10.76 s, 10.70 s, 10.60 s and 10.04 s. The C(aero) was 12%-13% of demand at sea level, 10%-11% at 2,000 m and 8%-9% at 4,000 m. When C(aero) decreased this led to better performance by making more energy available for acceleration. Accordingly, C(kin) increased from 20%-24% at sea level to 23%-27% at 4,000 m. There was no effect of altitude specific to body size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12012080     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-002-0587-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  7 in total

1.  Comments on Point:Counterpoint: Hypobaric hypoxia induces/does not induce different responses from normobaric hypoxia.

Authors:  Olivier Girard; Michael S Koehle; Martin J MacInnis; Jordan A Guenette; Michael S Koehle; Samuel Verges; Thomas Rupp; Marc Jubeau; Stephane Perrey; Guillaume Y Millet; Robert F Chapman; Benjamin D Levine; Johnny Conkin; James H Wessel; Hugo Nespoulet; Bernard Wuyam; Renaud Tamisier; Samuel Verges; Patrick Levy; Darren P Casey; Bryan J Taylor; Eric M Snyder; Bruce D Johnson; Abigail S Laymon; Jonathon L Stickford; Joshua C Weavil; Jack A Loeppky; Matiram Pun; Kai Schommer; Peter Bartsch; Mary C Vagula; Charles F Nelatury
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2012-05

Review 2.  The energy cost of sprint running and the role of metabolic power in setting top performances.

Authors:  Pietro E di Prampero; Alberto Botter; Cristian Osgnach
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Effects of Altitude/Hypoxia on Single- and Multiple-Sprint Performance: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Olivier Girard; Franck Brocherie; Grégoire P Millet
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  Factors limiting maximal performance in humans.

Authors:  Pietro Enrico di Prampero
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-08-09       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Improvement in 100-m Sprint Performance at an Altitude of 2250 m.

Authors:  Nicholas P Linthorne
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2016-05-12

6.  Moderate Altitude Affects High Intensity Running Performance in a Collegiate Women's Soccer Game.

Authors:  Jonathan D Bohner; Jay R Hoffman; William P McCormack; Tyler C Scanlon; Jeremy R Townsend; Jeffrey R Stout; Maren S Fragala; David H Fukuda
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 7.  Determinants of team-sport performance: implications for altitude training by team-sport athletes.

Authors:  David J Bishop; Olivier Girard
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 13.800

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.