BACKGROUND: We studied a number of factors, including ritonavir plasma levels, and their capability of predicting response to therapy with ritonavir (RTV). METHODS: Eleven HIV-positive children, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-experienced, protease inhibitor (PI) naive, receiving RTV in combination with two NRTIs were enrolled in the study. Demographic parameters were: median age (range) 10 (2-13) years, weight 26 (10-38) kg, body surface area (BSA) 0.93 (0.47-1.21) m(2). Baseline values of CD4, percent CD4 and viral load were 137 (2-1390) cells/microL, 9.5 (0.4-32.4)%, and 5.15 (4.30-6.18) log10 copies/mL, respectively. The dose of RTV was 318 (266-409) mg/m(2) twice daily. Peak (3.5 h after administration) and trough (predose) plasma concentrations of RTV were determined on one occasion at steady-state after a morning dose. Virological response to treatment was quantified as the difference between the baseline value of viral load and the value observed at 6 months of therapy (Delta(6)). RESULTS: The relationship between Delta(6) and demographic parameters (age, weight, BSA, and baseline CD4, percent CD4, and viral load) and plasma concentrations of RTV was studied by linear regression. Median (range) Delta(6) was 0.88 (0.77-2.62) log10 copies/mL. Peak and trough of RTV were 14.9 (3.2-31.4) and 5.0 (0.1-15.6) mg/L, respectively. Trough concentration of RTV was the best predictor of Delta(6), although the relationship between these two variables was not statistically significant (r = 0.56, P = 0.075). CONCLUSION: Our observation of a trend for a greater decrease in viral load in patients with higher trough concentration of RTV warrants further pharmacodynamic studies of PI in paediatric patients.
BACKGROUND: We studied a number of factors, including ritonavir plasma levels, and their capability of predicting response to therapy with ritonavir (RTV). METHODS: Eleven HIV-positive children, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-experienced, protease inhibitor (PI) naive, receiving RTV in combination with two NRTIs were enrolled in the study. Demographic parameters were: median age (range) 10 (2-13) years, weight 26 (10-38) kg, body surface area (BSA) 0.93 (0.47-1.21) m(2). Baseline values of CD4, percent CD4 and viral load were 137 (2-1390) cells/microL, 9.5 (0.4-32.4)%, and 5.15 (4.30-6.18) log10 copies/mL, respectively. The dose of RTV was 318 (266-409) mg/m(2) twice daily. Peak (3.5 h after administration) and trough (predose) plasma concentrations of RTV were determined on one occasion at steady-state after a morning dose. Virological response to treatment was quantified as the difference between the baseline value of viral load and the value observed at 6 months of therapy (Delta(6)). RESULTS: The relationship between Delta(6) and demographic parameters (age, weight, BSA, and baseline CD4, percent CD4, and viral load) and plasma concentrations of RTV was studied by linear regression. Median (range) Delta(6) was 0.88 (0.77-2.62) log10 copies/mL. Peak and trough of RTV were 14.9 (3.2-31.4) and 5.0 (0.1-15.6) mg/L, respectively. Trough concentration of RTV was the best predictor of Delta(6), although the relationship between these two variables was not statistically significant (r = 0.56, P = 0.075). CONCLUSION: Our observation of a trend for a greater decrease in viral load in patients with higher trough concentration of RTV warrants further pharmacodynamic studies of PI in paediatric patients.
Authors: Ana Pilar Nso; Beatriz Larru; Jose Ma Bellón; Ma José Mellado; Jose Tomás Ramos; Ma Isabel González; María Luisa Navarro; María Angeles Muñoz-Fernández; María Isabel de José Journal: Indian J Pediatr Date: 2010-03-19 Impact factor: 1.967
Authors: Antonio Valentin; Matthew Morrow; Richard H Poirier; Karen Aleman; Richard Little; Robert Yarchoan; George N Pavlakis Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.205